Cost of electricity 'must rise 15% to fight global warming'

Electricity bills and petrol prices should rise by more than 10 per cent to force homeowners and motorists to contribute to the cost of fighting global warming, Britain's premier scientific body recommends today.

Electricity bills and petrol prices should rise by more than 10 per cent to force homeowners and motorists to contribute to the cost of fighting global warming, Britain's premier scientific body recommends today.

The Royal Society said that the climate-change levy on businesses, which has been criticised for penalising manufacturing industry, should be replaced by a wider carbon tax that covers households and motorists.

Electricity bills would rise by about 1p per kilowatt-hour and a litre of petrol would cost an extra 6p if the Royal Society's recommendations are accepted by the Government, which is expected to publish a White Paper on energy before the end of the year.

The rises would add nearly 10 per cent to a litre of petrol and 15 per cent to an average annual electricity bill of £250, according to a spokesman for the power industry.

The report by the Royal Society into ways of controlling carbon dioxide emissions says the Government's climate-change levy is too crude because it penalises the use of energy by industry alone rather than the release of carbon dioxide from all sources.

"The climate-change levy is not a cost-effective way of reducing the carbon dioxide that is pumped into the atmosphere, as it is a tax on energy and not greenhouse gases," said Sir Eric Ash, who chaired the Royal Society committee.

"Moreover, the levy does not apply to the use of fossil fuels by households and transport, and penalises electricity sources that do not produce greenhouse gases," he said. Business leaders have also criticised the climate-change levy because they believe it unfairly penalises industries that have to use a lot of energy, such as manufacturing, while allowing those with larger workforces who have done nothing to improve energy efficiency to benefit from lower national insurance contributions.

Britain is committed to reducing emissions of carbon dioxide under the Kyoto treaty on climate change but the Royal Society says that it is not clear how its existing levy to reduce energy use will work beyond 2010.

It says it should be replaced by either a direct tax on all carbon dioxide emissions – effectively a rise in electricity and petrol bills – or a system of "tradable permits" which allow companies to emit a given quantity of greenhouse gases.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in