The Sketch: Peers: indefensible, but defend them we must

"The status quo is not an option." How many times have we heard that? And how often has it turned out to be the start of a powerful, coherent story with a wise moral and a happy ending? Never, is the answer. A Tale of Two Cities? Behold, A Man? Die Hard III? Hamlet? Have any of our heroes been impelled to begin their journey by realising that "the status quo is not an option"?

Jack Straw is back with his heroic proposals to defy the status quo and reform the House of Lords. Many have tried. The proposals litter the corridors of power. The only cheerful note in Jack's Stravian statement concerned the fate of the previous attempt to gain consensus for reform: "In a free vote, every single option was voted down." (Some cheers. A bark.)

The Sketch argues that the status quo is a perfectly good option, and probably the best available.

The Lords reads legislation that the Commons hasn't time to (hundreds of clauses get passed by our MPs without their ever being read out in public). It defies the Government on certain occasions, but has done so less frequently than Tory lords defied the Tory government.

People who find the status quo intolerable have difficulty saying why. Everything they want it to do, it does already. The composition of the House of Lords is, of course, indefensible. But attacks on it are equally indefensible. The whole subject is beyond reason, beyond definition, beyond rational construction. The only thing that can be said about the chamber is that it works better than the House of Commons.

A more rational composition would please those who suffer from the mania so common in the political class - that they can redesign institutions. This confidence is misplaced.

The voting proposals are so complicated that even to understand them is unBritish enough to be an act of treason. At bottom, they depend on party lists. That's all many of us need to know. Helmut Kohl lost his seat in the election but got back in by virtue of heading up his party's list. We did an ad at the time: "What do you call a leader you can't vote out of office? In Germany they call him Chancellor." And why this pious cry for more democracy in the Lords? The most powerful political body in Europe - the European Commission - is wholly undemocratic, and the only democratic element in the European Union (the Parliament) is powerless. By contrast, the only democratic element of the House of Lords is the hereditary peerage.

We do have the pleasure of "a train wreck" to look forward to, as the Leader of the House promised us. That's what we rubberneckers in the gallery want.

PS: A Tory MP asked the Prime Minister about Abu Hamza. The MP's name is Hands. There is no tasteful joke that can be made about this, but I offer the raw materials to be used in the privacy of your own home.

sketch@simoncarr.co.uk

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in