Railtrack abandons talks for new tactic: RMT denounces 'desperate' attempt to end dispute. Martin Whitfield reports

Martin Whitfield
Friday 19 August 1994 23:02
Comments

RAILTRACK is believed to have abandoned hope of a negotiated settlement in the signal workers' dispute and changed tactics to imposing individual contracts.

The company is to test its new methods on Monday at the start of the 13th day of disruption by the 4,600 signalling members of the National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers. A 24- hour strike begins at noon.

If Railtrack fails to persuade many strikers back to work, the dispute could go on for weeks.

Supervisors' rostered days off have been cancelled and shifts reorganised while all signal staff have been approached by management and urged to report for duty.

Railtrack says 40 per cent of the network will be open, allowing British Rail to run the highest number of trains since the dispute began on 15 June.

Nearly all BR divisions yesterday announced new services on strike days but the corporation refused to commit itself to Railtrack's 40 per cent target.

RMT leaders accused Railtrack of a desperate attempt to undermine support for the stoppage which is costing union members about pounds 50 a day in lost wages.

'It's all a softening-up exercise,' said a spokesman. 'They want to deceive signal workers into thinking the strike is crumbling so they can sell the new contracts. It's the only shot they've got left.'

The union believes Railtrack will begin to issue its new contracts over the Bank Holiday weekend and in advance of a 48- hour stoppage scheduled to begin on Tuesday 30 August.

The two sides have not been in contact since the end of July. Railtrack is insisting that negotiations include proposed restructuring while the RMT wants immediate settlement of a pay claim.

Dr Brian Mawhinney, Secretary of State for Transport, has ruled out increasing the cash available to settle the dispute and said any pay rise must be financed through productivity gains.

Railtrack dismissed safety fears raised by Aslef, the train drivers' union, which said it was seeking legal advice over the position of drivers concerned about the competence of some stand-in signallers.

'We will not allow our members or passengers to travel on a railway that is unsafe. If there is a risk we would be prepared to consider taking action,' Lew Adams, general secretary, said.

Frank Dobson, Labour's transport spokesman, said that rail privatisation had so far cost more than pounds 47.5m - nearly 10 times the cost of settling the dispute.

BR figures showed that, since April 1993, it has spent pounds 11.1m on consultants' fees in addition to the pounds 19.9m already spent by the Government. Railtrack said it had spent pounds 16.5m on privatisation.

'The fees handed over to the consultants would settle the dispute six times over,' Mr Dobson said. 'I can't believe that many people think that it's better spent on lawyers, merchant bankers and management consultants.'

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in