Widdecombe savages Portillo

Colin Brown,Political Editor
Sunday 24 June 2001 00:00
Comments

Michael Portillo and his supporters have an even darker side than Michael Howard, says Ann Widdecombe in an interview with the Independent on Sunday in which she explains why she pulled out of the Tory leadership race.

Miss Widdecombe helped destroy Mr Howard's chances of leading the Tory Party in 1997 after saying there was "something of the night" about him. Now, having given up her own hopes of winning the leadership, she intends to stop Mr Portillo from lifting the crown.

She attacked Mr Portillo and his "henchmen" for undermining her and William Hague.

She said: "I wish that Portillo and his supporters had behaved as well as Michael Howard has behaved since that time, because he has never let a paper get between us. I know he did not support my drugs policy, but he found a way to defend it."

Miss Widdecombe said she was still furious with the way Mr Portillo's "backbiters" destabilised Mr Hague before the election with off-the-record briefings.

She is backing Michael Ancram, but if he dropped out she would switch her support to Ken Clarke to stop Mr Portillo. She denies accusations that she is opposing Mr Portillo for admitting a gay past.

"I don't seek to outlaw alternative lifestyles ... My problem with Michael's approach is not that he had these experiences ... it's that he's tried to elevate them into some kind of political philosophy."

She was scathing about his conversion to Tory social liberalism. "I haven't been happy about all the agonising. It looks self-absorbed and irresolute," she said.

The Portillo camp may dismiss her views on the grounds that she carried too few MPs to run for the leadership herself, but she has support in the party's grass roots that Mr Portillo desperately needs to win.

She was not impressed by Mr Portillo's leadership bid. "I wanted to hear from him on the economy; I wanted to know how we were going to include people who are losing out very badly. He had a launch in some swanky restaurant in the shade of St James's Palace. It's all Blair again. It's all Cool Britannia and big money."

Miss Widdecombe abandoned her own campaign due to lack of support in the Commons. She revealed that some Tory MPs refused to support her because of her looks. "It has shaken some of my supporters, but it didn't shake me.

"People have given me a variety of reasons, which have ranged from style to looks. One or two said the image was wrong in a televisual age, that I am not sufficiently televisual. Others have said what they see as my brand of 'social authoritarianism' they don't like. One or two have mentioned fox hunting [she is in favour of a ban]. Nobody has been personally rude."

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in