State interference in a family matter

Saturday 26 March 2005 01:00
Comments

The struggle over the fate of Terri Schiavo appears to be drawing to a close. The 41-year-old Florida woman suffered severe brain damage as a result of a cardiac arrest in 1990 and has been in a persistent vegetative state ever since. She can breathe for herself, but has to be fed through a tube.

The struggle over the fate of Terri Schiavo appears to be drawing to a close. The 41-year-old Florida woman suffered severe brain damage as a result of a cardiac arrest in 1990 and has been in a persistent vegetative state ever since. She can breathe for herself, but has to be fed through a tube.

The parents of Ms Schiavo have been locked in a bitter legal battle with her husband and legal guardian, Michael Schiavo, over whether she ought to be allowed to die. Mr Schiavo argues that his wife has no quality of life and no prospect of recovery. But Ms Schiavo's parents distrust her husband's motives and are adamant their daughter should be kept alive. And so for seven years the two parties have fought it out in the Florida courts. The tragic case reached its nadir last weekend when the US Congress rushed through a special law allowing federal courts jurisdiction over the case. This was part of a final attempt by Ms Schiavo's parents to keep their daughter alive, after the state courts persistently found in favour of Mr Schiavo.

Now the legal process appears to have played itself out. No federal court has taken up the case. The US Supreme Court has repeatedly refused it. Ms Schiavo's feeding tube was removed over a week ago. With no judge to order it to be reinserted, she will probably die in a matter of days.

While it is impossible not to feel sympathy for what Ms Schiavo's family has been going through, there is a strong sense that her case has been hijacked. The interference in this case by the Republican-dominated Congress - and President Bush himself - was almost certainly intended to curry favour with the evangelical right, for whom Ms Schiavo has become a cause célèbre. The same is no doubt true of the significant involvement of the Florida governor and reputed presidential hopeful, Jeb Bush. The last US election demonstrated just how significant Christian conservatism is within the Republican party. The Schiavo case has to be seen through this prism.

But this politicking almost corrupted America's constitutional separation of powers between the executive and judiciary. Fortunately, the federal courts - following the lead of the Supreme Court - decided to stay out of it. But it could easily have been different. Americans, usually so jealous of their independence, came perilously close to seeing a private family dispute settled by the federal government.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in