More patients waiting longer than a year for surgery than in 1997

The proportion of patients waiting longer than a year for an operation has risen in more than half of health authorities since Labour came to power, figures released last night reveal.

The proportion of patients waiting longer than a year for an operation has risen in more than half of health authorities since Labour came to power, figures released last night reveal.

The Conservatives seized on the figures, which show that the percentage of patients waiting more than 12 months had risen in 50 of the 95 health authorities in England since 1997. The figures, revealed in a parliamentary written answer by John Hutton, the Minister of State for Health, also show large disparities in waiting-list performances between different parts of the country.

In West Surrey Health Authority, more than one in 10 patients have to wait longer than 12 months for an operation, while in Dorset only 0.1 per cent are left hanging on beyond 12 months. In West Sussex, 9.3 per cent must wait at least a year.

In some cases, the increases in the numbers of people waiting a year or more has been sharp. In south and west Devon, the proportion of patients waiting 12 months or more went from 0.7 per cent in 1997 to 6.6 per cent in August, the latest figures available. In east Kent, the proportion went from 0.3 to 6.9 per cent.

Liam Fox, the shadow Health Secretary, blamed the increase on government mismanagement of care homes, leading to hospital "bed-blocking". He said: "The Government was warned that its handling of this would lead to widespread home closures and bed losses and that is exactly what had happened."

The figures follow last week's damning report from the National Audit Office, which showed that managers at nine hospital trusts had "fiddled" waiting lists to disguise the number of very long delays.

Responding to yesterday's figures, West Sussex Health Authority said the high percentage of over-75 year olds in the area increased demand.

A spokeswoman for Dorset Health Authority said staff had developed a close relationship with social services to counter hospital bed-blocking and ensure patients had places to go such as community hospitals and care homes. Monthly checks on the waiting list and the use of the private sector had helped keep waiting times down, she said.

The worst authorities (as a percentage of patients waiting more than a year for in-patient treatment) are: West Surrey, 10.9 per cent; Croydon, 9.6 per cent; West Sussex, 9.3 per cent; East Surrey, 8.7 per cent; Lambeth, Southwark & Lewisham, 8.5 per cent.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in