Transport: The slow derailing of Prescott's grand plan

Barrie Clement,Transport Editor
Wednesday 30 July 2003 00:00
Comments

It is the policy that dare not speak its name. Mention of the 10-year transport plan, launched by John Prescott in 2000, no longer passes ministerial lips.

The Deputy Prime Minister's mission to persuade people to abandon their cars in favour of public transport has slowly been dropped.

The latest indication that it has been consigned to the political dustbin came recently when Alistair Darling, Secretary of State for Transport, announced £7bn worth of investment to widen Britain's motorways.

More importantly, he indicated that it could be two or three decades before a nationwide system of tolls to dissuade motorists from using their cars could be introduced.

There was no mention in Mr Darling's statement to the Commons of local "multi-modal" plans for public transport which form the bread and butter of an integrated policy.

An authoritative report from the Independent Transport Commission argued that if present official policies were pursued, motorists would face a 25 per cent increase in the volume of traffic over the next seven years.

The biggest symbol of the failure of Mr Prescott's plan is the railway network, which has already gobbled up the £33bn worth of state investment earmarked for expenditure over the 10-year period.

One massive drain on resources has been the engineering work undertaken since the Hatfield disaster, which happened a few months after the 10-year plan was launched. The £10bn project to upgrade the west coast main line soaked up another massive tranche of the investment. The work was originally costed at £2bn.

Tom Winsor, the Rail Regulator, has warned that the modernisation may never be fully completed.

The whole of the rail network has developed into a financial black hole in which the cost of maintenance work has exploded.

Half the train operating companies are technically insolvent and receiving vast sums of taxpayers' money. Virgin Trains alone is ingesting more than £500m in annual subsidies on top of £106m from the Strategic Rail Authority (SRA) in compensation for delays to the completion of the west coast main line.

The SRA's answer to all this financial mayhem is to cut services and increase fares above the inflation rate at a time when trains are arriving as late as they ever were. It is all a far cry from the promises made by Mr Prescott three years ago when he pledged to "get Britain moving again".

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in