The Trevor Phillips Islamophobia row proves Labour has a long road back to power

The party is right to take allegations of Islamophobia seriously, but the process leaves a lot to be desired

Andrew Grice
Monday 09 March 2020 14:38
Comments
Radio 4 Today show - Trevor Phillips accuses Labour of stifling debate after suspension over Islamophobia

Despite the media focus on the coronavirus outbreak, the Labour Party has managed to win some bad headlines by suspending Trevor Phillips, the veteran anti-racism campaigner, over allegations of Islamophobia.

Phillips, the first chair of the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC), has been accused of conduct prejudicial or grossly detrimental to the party. Jennie Formby, Labour’s general secretary, has suspended him “as a matter of urgency”, though an 11-page letter to him draws on statements dating back some years.

The irony is that Phillips, a Labour supporter for more than 30 years, introduced “Islamophobia” to the lexicon and lobbied successfully for the first law giving protection to Muslims from incitement to racial hatred in 2006.

Phillips, a broadcaster, has always been an outspoken figure. Some of his language seems designed to provoke a reaction. Labour wants to know why he said Enoch Powell’s infamous 1968 “rivers of blood” speech was “lauded as an example of the use of political rhetoric” (though he added that it ended Powell’s career).

Challenged on BBC Radio 4’s Today programme this morning over his 2016 claim that UK Muslims were “becoming a nation within a nation”, Phillips argued that his point was that “we cannot continue simply to say that differences won’t matter”. Another allegation is over Phillips’ call to abandon “the milk-and-water multiculturalism still so beloved of many, and adopting a far more muscular approach to integration”.

Other complaints on Labour’s charge sheet appear bizarre, such as his saying many men involved in grooming and sexually abusing children in towns including Rotherham were from Pakistani backgrounds. That is beyond dispute.

Phillips has clashed repeatedly with the Labour left. I remember him as Frank Dobson’s running mate in his ill-fated campaign to become London mayor in 2000 as the official Labour candidate when Ken Livingstone, an ally of Jeremy Corbyn, ran successfully as an independent. Today the tables have turned. Under Corbyn’s leadership, Labour headquarters is now in the grip of the left. Many Corbyn-sceptic staffers have walked or been squeezed out.

Although some left wingers would be glad to see the back of Phillips, many Labour figures will be alarmed by the move against him. It will look, to them, like revenge for Phillips declaring he could not vote Labour in December’s election because of the party’s handling of antisemitism allegations.

Phillips believes his suspension may have something to do with his EHRC, suggesting Labour might be trying to intimidate the EHRC as it completes its investigation into whether the party is antisemitic. With his usual understatement, Phillips says this would be “pure political gangsterism” and warns that Labour could be “a great party collapsing into a brutish, authoritarian cult”.

Yet whoever becomes Labour’s new leader next month should take his attack seriously. It will probably be Keir Starmer, though he cannot take it for granted, partly because of a growing row over some members not yet receiving their ballot papers.

Lisa Nandy, who is running against Rebecca Long-Bailey and Sir Keir, has written to Formby expressing concern about the delay. She is worried that many of the members affected are among the 100,000 to join since the December election (who are thought more likely to vote for her or Starmer than Long-Bailey, the continuity Corbyn candidate).

Whatever the cause, it is not a good look for Labour, just like the Phillips controversy. It’s another example of the factionalism that has bedevilled Labour under Corbyn’s leadership.

Perhaps we are seeing the last hurrah of a pro-Corbyn party machine that suspects Long-Bailey will not win and so knows that change is coming. Not before time.

Although at leadership hustings the three contenders agree on the urgent need for the party to unite, that will not be achieved at the flick of a switch. The incoming leader will have some bruising internal battles to fight, as well as the daunting task of winning back Labour’s lost voters.

Crucial to the internal struggle will be this year’s elections to the party’s ruling National Executive Committee (NEC), which currently has a hard left, pro-Corbyn majority. Making changes at Labour headquarters will not be easy unless the NEC fully supports the new leader.

It’s yet another reminder Labour has a long road ahead to get back in the game.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in