Donald Trump's 'largest tax cut in US history' claim shot down by Republican senator

Plan whose cost has halved since first announced is - at most - fifth-largest enacted, according to Iowa statesman Chuck Grassley, who took President to task on Twitter

Calvin Woodward
Friday 13 October 2017 09:29
0 comments
Donald Trump meeting with Henry Kissinger in the Oval Office
Donald Trump meeting with Henry Kissinger in the Oval Office

President Donald Trump is going around mischaracterising his tax plan as the largest tax cut in US history and a Republican senator is calling him out on it.

Iowa Senator Chuck Grassley tweeted on Thursday, as if speaking to Trump, “Ur tax cut will not be 'largest in history of country,'” and proceeded to offer a fact check “my own self.”

Grassley then laid out Bush-era tax cuts that were worth more, using nearly incomprehensible Twitterese.

A look at the matter:

"I'm giving the largest tax cuts in the history of this country,” Trump said on Tuesday after meeting Henry Kissinger.

The truth is that is tax plan is, at most, fifth-largest in its estimated cost, says Marc Goldwein, Senior Vice President and policy director at the nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget. It could well end up being even lower on the ladder historically.

The estimated cost of the tax plan has dropped by half or more since the spring, when only the contours were known.

In an analysis in April, Goldwein's group found that the $5.5 trillion plan that was then expected would have been the third largest since 1940 as a share of GDP, behind President Ronald Reagan's package in 1981 and tax cuts enacted in 1945 to phase out revenue generated for the Second World War.

But, citing estimated costs of $1.5 trillion to $2.5 trillion for Trump's plan now, Goldwein said several other historically significant tax cuts also would surpass Trump's: from 2013 and 1964.

Trump frequently overstates the size of his tax plan, though on some occasions he's called it one of the largest. Grassley tweeted on Thursday:

That statement is in the ballpark, if migraine-inducing.

Combining three rounds of tax cuts under Bush yields a package bigger than Trump's would be even if it tops out at $2.5 trillion. It's also conceivable that the first round of Bush tax cuts alone, worth over $1.3 trillion in 2001 dollars, would be bigger than Trump's package.

Grassley is “basically in the right,” Goldwein said.

Having worked to pass the Bush tax cuts as chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, Grassley wished to set the record straight.

But he went on to praise Trump's initiative, in his distinctive Twitter style, saying “regardless ur tax framework sets out badly needed cuts REFORM SIMPLIFICATION TO CREATE JOBS/ move byond ObamaSTAGNATION.”

AP

Comments

Share your thoughts and debate the big issues

Learn more

Delete Comment

Are you sure you want to delete this comment?

Report Comment

Are you sure you want to mark this comment as inappropriate?

Please be respectful when making a comment and adhere to our Community Guidelines.

  • You may not agree with our views, or other users’, but please respond to them respectfully
  • Swearing, personal abuse, racism, sexism, homophobia and other discriminatory or inciteful language is not acceptable
  • Do not impersonate other users or reveal private information about third parties
  • We reserve the right to delete inappropriate posts and ban offending users without notification

You can find our Community Guidelines in full here.

Create a commenting name to join the debate

Create a commenting name to join the debate

  • Newest first
  • Oldest first
  • Most liked

There are no Independent Premium comments yet - be the first to add your thoughts

Please be respectful when making a comment and adhere to our Community Guidelines.

  • You may not agree with our views, or other users’, but please respond to them respectfully
  • Swearing, personal abuse, racism, sexism, homophobia and other discriminatory or inciteful language is not acceptable
  • Do not impersonate other users or reveal private information about third parties
  • We reserve the right to delete inappropriate posts and ban offending users without notification

You can find our Community Guidelines in full here.

Create a commenting name to join the debate

Create a commenting name to join the debate

  • Newest first
  • Oldest first
  • Most liked

There are no comments yet - be the first to add your thoughts