Britain holds back £21m Rwanda aid over 'compelling reports' of aid for DRC rebels

 

Rebels from the M23 group in Goma
Rebels from the M23 group in Goma

Britain is to withhold £21m of aid to the government of Rwanda after accepting “compelling reports” that the country is supporting rebels in the Democratic Republic of Congo.

The move comes just three months after the former International Development Secretary, Andrew Mitchell, controversially reinstated £8m of direct budgetary support to Rwanda on his last day in the job.

Mr Mitchell, who had long-standing links to the government of President Paul Kagame, argued that he had reinstated the aid because the Rwandan government had met three conditions set down by the United Kingdom.

But his successor, Justine Greening, said today that the next payment of money, due to be paid this month, would not be released because the Kagame regime had breached the agreements.

“The Government has already set out its concerns over credible and compelling reports of Rwandan involvement with M23 in DRC,” she said. “This evidence constitutes a breach of the partnership principles set out in the Memorandum of Understanding and, as a result, I have decided not to release the next payment of budget support to Rwanda.”

Violence in DRC has been increasing, with reports of summary executions by the rebel M23 group and growing numbers of refugees.

The UK suspended the last tranche of £16m of aid in July after an interim UN report highlighted Rwanda’s role in backing the insurgents. Pressure to halt the aid payments again intensified earlier last month when UN experts presented more evidence of Rwanda’s involvement in fuelling the conflict.

Ms Greening also said today that DFID will provide a further £18m of immediate humanitarian support in the DRC, providing emergency food for 100,000 people, clean water and education.

The Prime Minister’s spokesman denied that the decision to reinstate aid in September had been a mistake.

“We stand by the decision that we made to release the last tranche of funding,” he said.

Meanwhile, the International Development Select Committee said aid to Rwanda should in future go through non-government channels.

The cross-party group of MPs also said they “did not understand” why Mr Mitchell concluded that the state was no longer supporting the M23.

“Mr Mitchell has assured us that he carried out extensive consultations within the UK Government and with the government of Rwanda before making his decision,” they said.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in