Labour leader Harriet Harman invited to National Security Council meeting by Prime Minister

The Government is trying to build a consensus on how best to tackle the continued threat from Isis

David Cameron has invited Harriet Harman to a meeting of the National Security Council to consider the threat posed by ISIS
David Cameron has invited Harriet Harman to a meeting of the National Security Council to consider the threat posed by ISIS

The Prime Minister has taken the rare step of inviting interim Labour leader Harriet Harman to a meeting of the National Security Council to consider the threat posed by Isis.

Expected to take place on Tuesday, it will be the first time an opposition leader has attended the top-level discussions since 2013.

It comes as the Government tries to build a consensus behind extending the RAF’s bombing campaign to include strikes against Isis in Syria.

“The PM thought it was important to ensure the Leader of the Opposition was fully briefed on the current situation,” a Downing Street spokesman said. “The shadow Defence Secretary, Vernon Coaker will also attend.”

While RAF strikes are being carried out against Isis in Iraq, they are not currently targeting the group’s Syrian strongholds, unlike their US counterparts.

It is thought that David Cameron believes the group needs to be confronted in both countries, but MP’s in his own party have loudly voiced their opposition to this.

So he would be reluctant to ask for a parliamentary vote unless he can be assured of Labour’s support in order to gain a Commons majority.

Mr Coaker has indicated Labour would “carefully consider” any new proposals from the Government, in a reversal of the position taken by his party’s former leader Ed Miliband, who made it clear he would block strikes on Syria.

A party spokesman confirmed that had been invited to the meeting, which is the Government's main forum for collective discussion of the threats posed to the country's security.

It is attended by senior ministers, with military chiefs and the heads of the intelligence agencies also regular participants.

Ministers also faced criticism over the decision to warn against all but essential travel to Tunisia, where 30 Britons were among the 38 holidaymakers gunned down on a beach in Sousse.

Isis claimed responsibility for last month’s attack by Seifeddine Rezgui who was shot dead by police shortly after his killing spree.

The North African country claimed the UK was playing into terrorists' hands with the warning and there were also complaints from tourists forced to cut short their holidays.

Tracey Caburn, who was on holiday with her mum and sister, called it “a disgrace” when she arrived back to Manchester Airport after cutting their break short.

“We would've stayed there,” she said. “We didn't feel threatened at all. There were guards on the roof, the gates, the beach. We wanted to stay.”

But Downing Street has insisted that “substantial” work was needed in Tunisia to improve security for tourists.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in