Newsstand

I've written before (in the context of current affairs Webzines) about the Web site of the Economist. What has brought me back is the news that the full content of the weekly printed edition is now available on the Web - but only for those who pay for it.

This is going against the present trend. The declared plans of some big- name Web publishers - notably Microsoft, with its Slate culture-zine - to charge for access have been abandoned or at least put on hold. But then the Economist has never been a slave to fashion, and has always had a high opinion of itself. (The fact that its content is not attributed to individual writers serves to underline the impression that the magazine views itself as a sort of ultimate arbiter.)

The Economist calls itself `the international weekly journal of news, ideas, opinion and analysis'. The real focus of the magazine is perhaps more clearly expressed in the two weekly synopses of world events presented on the Web site, `Politics this week' and `Business this week'. These are an excellent way to keep in touch without spending more than five minutes a week on the job. You get succinct copy, plain design, the occasional photo or chart, and no distractions. The site is worth bookmarking for these items alone.

These sections, happily, are still accessible without payment. So is the cover story - this week, a leader and a couple of features about euthanasia - and half a dozen other features. Most compelling - pushing aside pieces on the current vogue for governmental apologies and the Hong Kong handover - was a plea for an end to cyber-metaphors.

`Most metaphor abuse online comes from reinventing the bad bits of the physical world simply for the sake of familiarity. Do users really need to wiggle and click their mouse to open an animated door and walk over to a virtual bank teller to check their account balance online? Why do online malls have front doors? For that matter, why do they exist at all?'

Good questions, and it won't come as a surprise to hear that the Economist site is entirely free of such stuff. The buttons you click are text headings in a sans serif face separated by rules. It is as close as you could get on-screen to the rather severe paper publication it derives from. No harm in that, up to a point; but the Economist's text is entirely free of hyperlinks, which are after all the thing that makes the Web go round.

Personally, I'll remain an occasional non-paying visitor to the Economist site and an occasional buyer of the rag itself. For access to the `entire current issue of the Economist including Surveys and the Review of Books and Multimedia' you pay (at present) $48 a year. You currently get a free subscription to the Web edition until the end of 1997 if you take out a subscription to the paper editionn

Chris Gill

The Economist - http://www.economist.com

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in