Majority of energy customers on poor value tariffs which are up to £300 more expensive than the cheapest deals

Ofgem said more than half of consumers have never switched supplier or have switched only once

Josie Clarke
Tuesday 31 October 2017 16:26
0 comments
While bills have dropped since their peak in 2013, they are still higher in real terms than they were 10 years ago
While bills have dropped since their peak in 2013, they are still higher in real terms than they were 10 years ago

Some 60 per cent of energy customers remain on poor value "default" tariffs, which can be £300 more expensive a year than the cheapest deals, Ofgem said.

The regulator's annual State of the Market report said more than half of consumers (58 per cent) have never switched supplier or have switched only once, leaving them paying far more than those who engage with the market.

Ofgem said competition in the wholesale gas and electricity markets was working "reasonably well", with no company able to exploit a dominant position.

It said: "Following a long-term fall, wholesale prices, which reflect global prices, are just beginning to creep up or stabilise.

"However, if competition was working really well, we'd expect to see the benefits felt by all consumers.

"That's not the case at the moment. More than half of consumers (58 per cent) have never switched supplier or have switched only once. 60% of consumers are on variable 'default' tariffs, which can be around £300 more expensive each year than the cheapest fixed-term deals."

It added: "Some progress is being made; the number of customers on poor value tariffs has fallen over two years, as millions switched away from standard variable tariffs or had their prices protected by the pre-payment meter safeguard tariff.

"However, it's not happening far or fast enough."

The report said that while bills have dropped since their peak in 2013, they are still higher in real terms than they were 10 years ago.

While the proportion of households in fuel poverty had remained stable since 2003, they were in greater need because their bills were higher.

PA

Comments

Share your thoughts and debate the big issues

Learn more

Delete Comment

Are you sure you want to delete this comment?

Report Comment

Are you sure you want to mark this comment as inappropriate?

Please be respectful when making a comment and adhere to our Community Guidelines.

  • You may not agree with our views, or other users’, but please respond to them respectfully
  • Swearing, personal abuse, racism, sexism, homophobia and other discriminatory or inciteful language is not acceptable
  • Do not impersonate other users or reveal private information about third parties
  • We reserve the right to delete inappropriate posts and ban offending users without notification

You can find our Community Guidelines in full here.

Create a commenting name to join the debate

Create a commenting name to join the debate

  • Newest first
  • Oldest first
  • Most liked

There are no Independent Premium comments yet - be the first to add your thoughts

Please be respectful when making a comment and adhere to our Community Guidelines.

  • You may not agree with our views, or other users’, but please respond to them respectfully
  • Swearing, personal abuse, racism, sexism, homophobia and other discriminatory or inciteful language is not acceptable
  • Do not impersonate other users or reveal private information about third parties
  • We reserve the right to delete inappropriate posts and ban offending users without notification

You can find our Community Guidelines in full here.

Create a commenting name to join the debate

Create a commenting name to join the debate

  • Newest first
  • Oldest first
  • Most liked

There are no comments yet - be the first to add your thoughts