- News
- Video
- People
-
Voices
-
Find by writer
- Yasmin Alibhai-Brown
- Rebecca Armstrong
- Memphis Barker
- Max Benwell
- Chris Blackhurst
- Ian Burrell
- Andrew Buncombe
- Ben Chu
- Patrick Cockburn
- Mary Dejevsky
- Grace Dent
- Robert Fisk
- Andrew Grice
- Stefano Hatfield
- Lucy Hunter Johnston
- Howard Jacobson
- Alice Jones
- Ellen E Jones
- Comment
- Editorials
- Letters
- Happy List
- Campaigns
- Archive
- Our Voices
-
Commentators
- Yasmin Alibhai-Brown
- Terence Blacker
- Simon Carr
- Rupert Cornwell
- Sloane Crosley
- Mary Dejevsky
- Robert Fisk
- Andrew Grice
- Adrian Hamilton
- Philip Hensher
- Howard Jacobson
- Dominic Lawson
- John Lichfield
- Campaigns
- Hamish McRae
- Matthew Norman
- Christina Patterson
- John Rentoul
- Columnists
- Democracy 2015
- IV Drip Archive
- Blogs
- If I were PM
- Scottish independence
- Save the tiger
- The state of the NHS
-
Find by writer
- Sport
- Tech
- Life
- Property
- Arts + Ents
- Travel
- Money
- IndyBest
- Student
- Offers
Early days, but it seems Saudi Arabia has scored the first major victory in the great oil war. The decision by the world’s biggest mining company, BHP Billiton, to cut its US shale oil operation by 40 per cent suggests that the collapse in the price of oil, exacerbated by the Saudis pumping huge volumes to flood world markets, is indeed starting to make the exploitation of North American shale reserves unprofitable. That, in turn, will eventually reduce capacity, reduce supply and raise the long-term equilibrium price of oil and other fossil fuels. That, supposedly, will secure Saudi Arabia’s position as a low-cost dominant producer.
Or at least that is how thinking apparently goes in Riyadh. The obvious flaw comes if the price is eventually restored to such a level that fracking becomes profitable once more, and the whole belligerent cycle starts all over again. Perhaps the Saudis and their allies in the Gulf believe there is a “Goldilocks” oil price – too low for shale to be worth getting out of the ground, but high enough to protect their revenues. Given the potential, and unpredictable, impact on demand from slowing growth in the eurozone and China, in particular, that sweet spot in the oil price may prove more theoretical than real.
At all events, the prospect is for much more volatility in the price of oil, which has dropped by two-thirds in three years. It adds uncertainty to the outlook for the world economy, and that in itself will tend to depress investment and growth.
Unless the major producers in Opec and outside, including the United States, can come to some sort of arrangement about where they would like the oil price to be in future – unlikely given the complexion of some involved, including Iran, Venezuela and Russia – the world will have to get used to these gyrations. Such ups and downs, however, are preferable to permanently cheap oil. While it seems churlish to deny hard-pressed households a respite from ever-rising energy bills, the inconvenient truth is that cheap oil is bad for the planet. In the short term it makes consumers and industries less careful about energy efficiency. In the longer term it wrecks investment in alternative sources of energy and transport, such as electric cars.
The solution is obvious, if unpopular. Public subsidies for the coal, oil and gas industries should be ended worldwide. And in the UK now is the time to raise taxes and duties on energy to prevent its cost from falling too far, to industry and to consumers, either by compensating with increases to duty or by adjusting carbon pricing regimes in order that prices remain high. This is, admittedly, no vote winner. And yet the biggest single influence on energy consumption, after overall economic growth, is its price, and the price of fossil fuels relative to alternative sources of energy.
It is also true that taxes on energy can hit the poorest hardest, proportionately. That is why such a stabilisation of fuel bills at current levels has to be joined by curbs on excessive profits being made by energy companies, with those funds transferred to poorer households, so that they can cope with the high bills.
As is often observed, the UK accounts for only a tiny proportion of global energy consumption, and is greener than most. In much of the world energy taxes are far lower – and in places such as Indonesia, Iran and Venezuela, fuel is actually subsidised. Globally, consumers are enjoying their fuel and energy price windfall. It is a global issue, and the oil price collapse has made the work of this year’s international climate summit in Paris an awful lot more difficult.
-
Shafqat Hussain executed: Pakistan hangs 'killer' – despite claims he was tortured into confessing when he was 14
-
Richard Dawkins ridicules Sabrina Corgatelli for claiming her giraffe kill was 'ethical'
-
Tube strike: Union bosses planning 'further 48-hour action' following August strike
-
The Corbyn fallacy: The would-be Labour leader’s anti-austerity plan doesn’t address the structural deficit – and is thus fatally flawed
-
RBS share sale explainer: why has Osborne started selling the taxpayer's stake at a loss?
-
Jeremy Corbyn on the Calais crisis: 'Do we deal with it militarily or on the basis that we're all human beings?'
Editorial
Get the best in opinion from Independent Voices, straight to your inbox every Thursday lunchtime.
Subscribe
iJobs General
Recruitment Genius: IT Support Technician
£20000 - £22000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: This is an intermediate help de...
Recruitment Genius: Personal Injury Fee Earners
£15000 - £25000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: This specialist personal injury...
Recruitment Genius: New Business Sales Executive / Business Development
£20000 - £30000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: Join a fast growing, UK based I...
Recruitment Genius: Tennant Liaison Officer
Negotiable: Recruitment Genius: An experienced TLO is required to manage, deli...