Boris Johnson to defy Speaker’s demand for MP vote on cuts to foreign aid

Lindsay Hoyle called for vote to show ‘due respect’ to House of Commons

Andrew Woodcock
Political Editor
Tuesday 08 June 2021 13:28
Comments
Lindsay Hoyle calls on government to give MPs chance to take 'effective decision' on aid cuts

Boris Johnson will not comply with the Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle’s demand for the cut in UK overseas aid spending to be put to a vote in the House of Commons, Downing Street has said.

Mr Johnson escaped a likely defeat at the hands of Tory rebels in the Commons on Monday evening, after an attempt to force a vote was ruled out of order for technical reasons.

But in an unusually brutal slapdown for the PM, Sir Lindsay accused Mr Johnson of failing to show the Commons “the due respect which it deserves” and demanded an urgent and legally-binding vote on the cuts from 0.7 to 0.5 per cent of gross national income (GNI).

Today, the prime minister’s official spokeperson responded: “There are currently no plans to bring forward a vote.”

Former PM Theresa May is expected to lead a list of Tory grandees savaging the cut in a three-hour emergency debate in the House of Commons, in a humiliating spectacle for Mr Johnson just days before he chairs the G7 meeting of international leaders in Cornwall.

Ms May and others - including former international development secretary Andrew Mitchell and Commons defence committee chair Tobias Ellwood - will argue that the cuts threatens the lives of hundreds of thousands of people in poor countries and damage the UK’s “soft power” overseas.

But no vote is expected at the end of today’s debate, as Tory rebels believe that it would be pointless to force a purely symbolic division which would not be binding on the government and is likely to be boycotted by most Conservatives, including Mr Johnson himself.

The commitment to meet the United Nations target of spending 0.7 per cent of GNI on overseas development assistance on was enshrined in law by David Cameron and confirmed by Mr Johnson in the Conservative manifesto in 2019.

But the PM’s spokesperson said that the law did not require ministers to obtain MPs’ approval for a temporary reduction.

“We are clear that the government’s decision to temporarily reduce the aid budget to 0.5 per cent of GNI is compatible with the International Development Act, which explicitly envisages there may be circumstances where the 0.7 target is not met,” said the spokesman.

Despite the cut, the UK is expected to spend more than £10bn this year on improving global health, fighting poverty and tackling climate change, he said.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in