Fox reporter says that if women in states that ban abortion want terminations they can live elsewhere

‘States may put more restrictions on [abortion], but people have the right to leave’

Graig Graziosi
Wednesday 04 May 2022 23:41
Comments

Related video: Arkansas attorney general defends abortion ban in cases of rape and incest

A Fox Business Network correspondent said that women concerned that their abortion rights will be stripped by the potential overturning of Roe v Wade should move to states where the practice is allowed.

In the wake of the leak of a draft Supreme Court decision that would overturn the landmark abortion ruling, people across the country have feared the implications of such a ruling, namely that women will lose the right to have legal abortions.

If the ruling is overturned later this year, nearly half of the states in the US will automatically ban most abortions.

Fox Business Network correspondent Jackie DeAngelis said that women concerned that their rights are being stripped away could simply pick up their lives and move to a state that allows abortion.

"States may put more restrictions on [abortion], but people have the right to leave. They can go live somewhere else where it’s more of a free-for-all and they could do whatever they want ... it should be about choices we want to make," she said.

She said that many conservatives live in states with Democratic leadership and have to put up with liberal policies like "tax and spend" or "soft on crime." She said those conservatives have the option to move if they do not want to deal with those policies, and liberals have the same right to leave.

Apart from Ms DeAngelis' insinuation that tax policies are comparable to the deeply personal and potentially life-altering decision of whether or not to have a child, it also does not take into account women and families whose financial or family situations do not allow them the luxury of moving states, nor does it take into account individuals who are licensed in certain areas or own homes for whom moving would come at a steep cost.

Overturning Roe v Wade could open an avenue for Republicans to push for federal legislation enacting a total ban on abortions nationwide. The Washington Post reported that Republican lawmakers and anti-abortion activists have already met to discuss federal legislation under the assumption that the Supreme Court will strike down Roe v Wade.

“By [Republicans] saying out loud that their goal is to push a nationwide abortion ban, it makes it clear that we have to elect more pro-reproductive health champions on the national level and in the states,” Planned Parenthood Action Fund executive director Kelley Robinson told the Post, calling the potential federal proposal “terrifying”.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in