Salisbury train crash: 13 treated in hospital after collision

Three remain as inpatients morning after crash, Salisbury NHS Foundation Trust says

Monday 01 November 2021 11:15
Comments
<p>Two trains collided in a tunnel in Salisbury on Sunday evening</p>

Two trains collided in a tunnel in Salisbury on Sunday evening

Thirteen people were treated in hospital after two trains collided in Salisbury, a local NHS trust has said.

Four of these were admitted to Salisbury District Hospital after being injured in the crash.

All are understood to be in a stable condition.

Police had said a “small number” of people - including the driver - were taken to hospital following the crash, which took place in the Fisherton Tunnel on the east side of the city on Sunday evening.

It happened when a rear carriage of one train derailed, with another train crashing into it after signalling was damaged.

Salisbury NHS Foundation Trust said in a statement 13 casualties were treated at Salisbury District Hospital following the crash.

Out of the four that were admitted, one has been discharged and the other remain as inpatients, the trust said on Monday morning.

“We are pleased to report that all are in a stable condition,” its statement added.

Stacey Hunter, the trust’s chief executive, said: “I would like to thank all our colleagues who responded to this incident in a calm, professional and compassionate manner.

“We are all relieved that the outcome of the accident hasn’t been more severe”.

Police were called to the tunnel in Salisbury at 6.46pm on Sunday “following reports of a train derailment which involved two passenger trains colliding”.

Firefighters said around 100 people were evacuated from the scene.

After the collision, the derailed train - a Great Western Railway (GRW) service from Portsmouth Harbour to Bristol Temple Meads - was believed to be on its side. The other involved - a South Western Railway (SWR) train from London Waterloo to Honiton - remained upright.

British Transport Police said on Sunday night the line was expected to remain shut “for some time” following the incident.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in