US Congress to host first hearing on UFOs in more than 50 years

Lawmakers want public transparency after report conclude UFOS are physical objects of unknown origin

Jon Kelvey
Tuesday 17 May 2022 09:07
Comments
Pentagon releases declassified videos showing UFOs

The US Congress is set to hold a public hearing on the topic of Unidentified Aerial Phenomena, or UAPs — the new Pentagon nomenclature for what were once dubbed “UFOs”.

The US House Intelligence Committee’s subcommittee on Counterterrorism, Counterintelligence, and Counterproliferation will host the hearing beginning at 10am EDT on Tuesday, and the hearing will be carried live on YouTube. Following the public hearing, the committee will hold a classified hearing on the Pentagon’s Airborne Object Identification and Management Synchronization Group.

It will be the first congressional hearing on UFOs since the 1970s, a fact Indiana Representative André Carson pointed out on Twitter. The Democrat will lead the hearing.

The hearing will feature two witnesses, deputy director of naval intelligence Scott Bray, and undersecretary of defense for intelligence and security Ronald Moultrie. Mr Moultrie leads the Airborne Object Identification and Management Synchronization Group, which was setup at the Pentagon in the wake of a June 2021 report to Congress from the US Office of the Director of National Intelligence that found more than 140 UFO sightings since 2004, many made by military pilots, could not be explained.

The report was inconclusive, noting there was no evidence to suggest they were extraterrestrial in origin or the product of foreign military projects. At the same time, the investigators believe the observed phenomena did “represent physical objects” that appeared to behave in ways behind the technological capabilities of the US.

But if the report was inconclusive with regard to UFO origins, the report was clear that investigating the sighting is important to US interests.

“UAP clearly pose a safety of flight issue and may pose a challenge to US national security,” the report read. “Safety concerns primarily centre on aviators contending with an increasingly cluttered air domain. UAP would also represent a national security challenge if they are foreign adversary collection platforms or provide evidence a potential adversary has developed either a breakthrough or disruptive technology.”

Since the publication of the report last year, a bipartisan chorus of lawmakers have expressed frustration that the investigation of UFOs is not proceeding faster. Lawmakers such as Republican Senator from Florida Marco Rubio, and Democratic Senator from New York Kirsten Gillibrand.

“This may be the very thing that brings Democrats and Republicans together,” Representative Carson told the New York Times, “at least for an hour or two.”

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in