Information watchdog tests law over advice on invasion

Marie Woolf,Chief Political Correspondent
Wednesday 09 February 2005 01:00
Comments

The information watchdog has established an expert team to decide whether advice to the Prime Minister on the legality of invading Iraq should be made public. The unit will have access to top-secret legal opinion as well as correspondence between Lord Goldsmith, the Attorney General, and Tony Blair.

The information watchdog has established an expert team to decide whether advice to the Prime Minister on the legality of invading Iraq should be made public. The unit will have access to top-secret legal opinion as well as correspondence between Lord Goldsmith, the Attorney General, and Tony Blair.

The Information Commissioner, Richard Thomas, has had several complaints under the Freedom of Information Act about the Government's decision to withhold the advice.

His decision to appoint a special team comes amid growing frustration with the Government's refusal to release files under the Act. The Independent, among others refused permission to see the advice, has learnt that the unit has been established because of "the unusual circumstances".

Under the Act, Mr Thomas has the right to demand the Government release the file if he decides it is in the public interest. His decision is being regarded as a test case. The watchdog's lawyers are expected to examine the Government's contention that legal opinions formed by the Attorney General are never released.

The investigation will start in a fortnight, when "we have received all the related complaints and are able to decide what documents in addition to the advice itself the commissioner may wish to inspect".

Sir Menzies Campbell MP, deputy leader of the Liberal Democrats and a senior barrister, said the Government "has set its own precedent" when it decided to publish part of it. "To understand the full measure of the advice we need to see the opinion in its entirety," he said. "The argument against the release of advice is that it is against the public interest but this is a case where public interest points in the opposite direction."

The commissioner has also had complaints that the Government has breached the terms of the Act by failing to contact people who have requested information before releasing a response publicly.

David Lowry, an environmental research consultant, complained to the commissioner after he found the refusal to release the legal advice on a government website. By law, the Government must issue a refusal notice directly to him.

The Information Commissioner wrote to Mr Lowry after he complained, saying he will raise the matter "at the conclusion of our consideration of the other complaints".

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in