New York opens criminal investigation into Trump Organization

Former president faces allegations that Trump Organization misstated real estate valuations to reduce their tax liabilities

Trump claims bank fraud investigation is 'continuation of witch hunt'

The New York Attorney General’s office has said it is expanding its civil probe into former president Donald Trump’s business empire, and that it is now “actively investigating the Trump Organization in a criminal capacity”.

Attorney General Letitia James’s office, which was already conducting a civil investigation of Mr Trump’s company, suggested that the probe is in conjunction with an ongoing criminal investigation on him by the office of Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr.

"We have informed the Trump Organization that our investigation into the organisation is no longer purely civil in nature," Fabien Levy, a spokesman for the attorney general’s office, said in a statement.

"We are now actively investigating the Trump Organization in a criminal capacity, along with the Manhattan DA," he said.

For two years, the civil investigation has been probing whether the Trump Organization manipulated property values to secure loans and obtain economic and tax benefits.

The new development come as an additional potential liability for Mr Trump, who continues to tease the prospect of running again for office in 2024. He has previously said he is “beyond seriously” considering a run but cannot announce it yet “from a legal standpoint.”

A separate investigation by Manhattan’s Mr Vance has been looking into similar allegations over the business dealings done by Mr Trump during his pre-presidency period spanning about two years. The allegations were first made by the former president’s personal lawyer Michael Cohen.

Mr Cohen reacted to the development by sharing a photoshopped picture of Mr Trump behind bars in jail, saying “the troubles for Donald Trump will keep on coming.”

“Soon enough, Donald and Associates will be held responsible for their actions,” he said in a tweet.

In February, the Supreme Court refused an attempt to block Mr Vance’s team from getting access to Mr Trump’s tax returns from the past eight years, as well as his financial records, as a part of the probe into potential bank, tax and insurance fraud.

Ms James' investigation started in 2019 when Mr Cohen said in a congressional hearing that Mr Trump has inflated the value of assets to banks to secure better insurance and loan deals, while at the same time undervaluing them to cut taxes.

Her investigations involve several Trump properties including the Trump International Hotel and Trump Tower in Chicago as well as 40 Wall Street in New York City.

Mr Trump has previously dismissed the investigations, conducted by Democrats Ms James and Mr Vance, by calling them politically motivated.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in