Army had quotas for blacks and Asians

The recruitment of black and Asian soldiers was held back for decades under a secret policy of "quotas" that ensured no Army unit became dominated by recruits from ethnic minority backgrounds.

The recruitment of black and Asian soldiers was held back for decades under a secret policy of "quotas" that ensured no Army unit became dominated by recruits from ethnic minority backgrounds.

Files released under the Freedom of Information Act today show that Army medical officers were instructed to make a note of all new recruits who did not have North European facial features.

Medical staff were told to secretly record details of "Asiatic or Negroid features" as part of a policy of "quota restrictions" which was regarded as so sensitive that not even ministers were told of its existence.

A briefing paper from November 1972, written for the Adjutant General of the Army and marked "Personal - in confidence", explained how the system worked.

"Officially, we state that we do not keep statistics of coloured soldiers," it noted. "In fact we do have a record, resulting from a description put on the attestation paper by the medical officer of the features of the recruit eg, north European, Mediterranean, Asiatic, African or Negroid, others etc."

Anyone identified as having non-north European facial features was designated "D factor", which was used to restrict the number of ethnic minority personnel serving in a unit.

The papers also show that medical officers were given considerable latitude in deciding which individuals should be classified as "D factor". It could be extended to someone of Mediterranean appearance or even a "swarthy Frenchman".

Files reveal that the policy began in the 1960s and was still being pursued in 1976.

The briefing paper said: "At the Manning and Record Offices a broad division is drawn between north European and all others and the punch cards for the latter are punched in such a way that they can be identified if required." It added: "The determination of the characteristics is at the discretion of the various medical officers and could include such examples as Chinamen, Maltese or even swarthy Frenchman."

The memo then went on to describe the purpose of the system, which at that stage had been going for 15 years.

"This system has been in operation since 1957 and enabled us to keep a check on the numbers of non-Europeans in the corps of the Army so as to ensure that our assimilation levels (quota restrictions) were being adhered to," it said.

A further note on the "D factor" from 1975 stated: "Between 1.5 per cent and 2 per cent of Army recruits have these characteristics. Since it stems from medical records, this information should not be disclosed outside the department."

A spokesman for the Ministry of Defence was unable to say exactly when the policy of quotas ended, only that "the Army is an equal opportunities employer."

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in