Arts Council dance policy 'falsely based'

David Lister,Arts Correspondent
Sunday 23 January 1994 00:02
Comments

ONE OF the leading figures in contemporary dance has broken a conspiracy of silence and accused the Arts Council's dance department of exaggerating audience figures and of bringing 'political correctness' into dance.

The council has switched pounds 700,000 into modern dance from other art forms including drama because, it says, audiences are burgeoning.

But yesterday, Michael Merwitzer, artistic director of The Kosh, claimed that the council had no up-to-date statistics and audiences were not growing at all. 'Indeed, it is obvious to everyone in dance that the current year is an all-time low.'

The council's dance department confirmed that it had last year's audience figures for only two of the 50 or so companies to which it gives money; its assertion that audiences are growing is based on the British Market Research Bureau Target Group Index, a general sample of the population, which suggests that audiences rose slightly between 1991-92 and 1992-93, but are far lower than in 1987.

Mr Merwitzer, whose company has just had its grant cut from pounds 194,000 to pounds 150,000 by the council, has taken its popular mixture of dance, theatre, acrobatics and narrative not just to conventional theatres but also to hospitals, factories and even the Post Office's Mount Pleasant main sorting office in London over the past 10 years.

Having researched bookings in contemporary dance, he says audiences for his company are at an all-time high, playing to 25,000 in the current year, while audiences for most others have been falling.

'The Arts Council can't show that there's a burgeoning audience for dance,' he said. 'They have no hard data, which is in itself quite astounding.

'We should be asking how many dates companies play and at what size venues,' he added.

The Arts Council disapproves of his company, he says, because of the sort of dance it performs - populist, narrative-based stories, with words as well as movement. 'We are seeing political correctness from the Arts Council dance department.'

Sue Hoyle, the council's dance director, denied that the department insisted on certain forms of dance. She said the decision to cut The Kosh's grant had been taken because council officers and advisers had reported adversely on standards in its latest shows.

The Independent described its most recent show, however, as 'a sinuous, mesmerising show performed with beautiful precision'.

(Photograph omitted)

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in