Nato to 'name and shame' countries which fail to meet defence budget target

The UK is believed to be one of just four member states which meet the required figure of two per cent of GDP

Ian Johnston
Monday 15 June 2015 10:37
Comments
A report states that Nato plan to ‘name and shame’ countries which fail to spend the target amount on defence by publishing a league table amid concern over Russian aggression in Ukraine
A report states that Nato plan to ‘name and shame’ countries which fail to spend the target amount on defence by publishing a league table amid concern over Russian aggression in Ukraine

Nato plans to ‘name and shame’ countries which fail to spend the target amount on defence by publishing a league table amid concern over Russian aggression in Ukraine, according to a report.

The UK is believed to be one of just four member states which meet the required figure of two per cent of gross domestic product (GDP).

However there have been reports that budget cuts designed to reduce the UK’s deficit could mean spending will fall below this.

The Daily Telegraph reported that the Nato defence spending league table would be published next week ahead of a Nato defence ministers meeting in Brussels.

They will be ranked according to spending last year and that is expected to show that only the UK, US, Greece and Estonia out of the 28 Nato members met the target figure.

According to a report in The Times last month, the Ministry of Defence has been asked to find cuts of £1bn in its spending this year – a figure that analysts warned could reduce the military’s budget to slightly below 2 per cent of GDP, depending on how the economy performs.

The Government has said it expects to meeting the Nato spending target this year, but that a spending review in the autumn will decide how much the Armed Forces receive in 2016/17.

US President Barack Obama met David Cameron earlier this month during the G7 summit and urged him to ensure defence spending is maintained.

However a source told The Independent that the Prime Minister had not given Mr Obama the assurance that he sought.

And Mr Cameron told journalists ahead of the meeting: “I will say (to President Obama) exactly the same as I'm saying now which is we're having a spending review in the autumn and we'll announce the results at that time.”

Michael Fallon, the Defence Secretary, has also suggested that part of the foreign aid budget spent on stabilising countries and preventing conflict could be reclassified as part of the defence budget.

Lord Robertson, the former Labour Defence Secretary and ex-Nato Secretary-General, dismissed that idea.

“Including the foreign aid budget in defence spending is just sleight of hand. It’s double entry bookkeeping,” he said.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in