Bosses blamed for rail crash

THE GOVERNMENT told Railtrack yesterday not to "put profit before safety" after an investigation into an accident that injured four people uncovered a catalogue of failures.

The entire railway industry was ordered to improve its safety procedures to prevent a repeat of the derailment at Bexley in south-east London.

The accident happened on 4 February 1997. Seven of the 19 wagons of the ballast-carrying train derailed on a bridge, injuring four people in or near the arches of the viaduct.

The Railway Inspectorate found the accident was caused by the poor condition of the track, the fact that one wagon was overloaded and the excessive speed of the train.

Bob Smallwood, the deputy chief inspector of railways, said yesterday: "The under-lying causes of the accident were failures in management of safety by Railtrack and its contractors."

John Reid, a Transport minister, said he was concerned by the finding of poor management by Railtrack of its contractors. "Railtrack needs to invest in maintenance, put better management structures in place, and must not put profit before safety," he said.

Railtrack and two contractors - South East Infrastructure Maintenance and Southern Track Renewals - were prosecuted for breaches of the 1974 Health and Safety at Work Act. Last September all three pleaded guilty at Kingston Crown Court in south-west London and were fined pounds 150,000.

A Railtrack spokesman said yesterday: "The minute Bexley happened and our investigation was complete we started to implement changes.

"These have been ongoing and were acknowledged by the judge in the case."

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in