Farm pesticides killing twice as many bees than first thought, study finds

‘Synergistic effect’ of using pesticides together could accidentally kill more bees, experts warn

Farmers are being sold agricultural pesticides that can kill twice as many bees, according to an analysis of 90 studies which delved into the impact of environmental pressures.

The factors - many of which are a consequence of human activity - include land use and climate change, with intensive agriculture and pest control playing a significant role.

Pesticides in particular were found to have put physiological and nutritional stress on bees, with the “cocktail”of agrochemicals they encounter in intensively-farmed environments posing a risk to their populations.

Because of this, the researchers believe commercial formulas should require their own licences.

Speaking on BBC Radio 4’s ‘Inside Science’ programme, lead Dr Harry Siviter said: “We should really consider the interaction between those chemicals.

“We don’t continue to monitor pesticides once they’re licensed for use, so we’re proposing post-licensing observations.”

Dr Siviter, who led the study, noted that from the 356 interactions the team of researchers studied, bees colonies exposed to agrochemicals were more likely to die.

“If you have a honey bee colony exposed to one pesticide that kills 10 per cent of the bees, and another pesticide that kills another 10 per cent, you could expect if those effects were additive, 20 per cent of the bees would be killed,” he explained.

However, a “synergistic effect” could bring the figure up to between 30 and 40 per cent mortality, he said.

The team’s report read: “Subgroup analysis of bee mortality revealed strong evidence for synergy when bees were exposed to multiple agrochemicals at field-realistic levels, but interactions were not greater than additive expectations when bees were exposed to parasites and/or nutritional stressors.”

Their analysis also found stark differences in the way various parasites groups impacted bee populations.

The findings coincide with a petition launched by Dave Goulson, a professor of biology at the University of Sussex, calling for the ban of pesticides.

He argued the agrochemicals not only threatened bees and other wildlife, but posed a potential catastrophe to humans too as many were carcinogens and or neurotoxins.

Professor Goulson called on the government to ban pesticides in all 22 million gardens, park, road verges and other green spaces.

He said: “There is simple no need to spray poisons in our streets, parks and gardens for cosmetics purposes where they harm bees and other wildlife, and post a risk to human health.

“Safe alternatives are available, where necessary.”

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in