'Happy Birthday' song finally free to use after copyright lifted in landmark court ruling

For 80 years, film companies have been forced to pay to feature the song

Lizzie Dearden@lizziedearden
Wednesday 23 September 2015 07:56
0 comments

The “Happy Birthday” song is finally free to use after a landmark court ruling in the US that concluded it should be “dedicated to public use and in the public domain”.

It comes after 80 years of film and production companies being forced to pay Warner/Chappell Music Inc to feature the song, avoid using it completely or avoid copyright by characters awkwardly interrupt the singing as it starts.

But US District Judge George H. King ruled on Tuesday that the music publishing company can no longer collect royalties, as it does not hold a valid copyright on the lyrics to the tune that is one of the mostly widely sung in the world,.

“Happy Birthday’s” original copyright, obtained by the Clayton F. Summy Co. from writers, only covered the tune's musical arrangement and not the lyrics, he concluded in a 43-page ruling.

It came at the conclusion of a lawsuit filed two years ago by Good Morning To You Productions Corp, which is working on a documentary film tentatively titled “Happy Birthday”, alongside several other plaintiffs.

The company challenged the Warner/Chappell’s copyright now held by, arguing that the song should be “dedicated to public use and in the public domain.”

“'Happy Birthday' is finally free after 80 years,” said Randall Newman, a lawyer for the plaintiffs in the suit, told the LA Times. “Finally, the charade is over. It's unbelievable.”

The lawsuit also asked for monetary damages and restitution of more than $5 million (£3.3 million) in licensing fees that had been collected from thousands of people and groups who paid to use the song over the years.

Marshall Lamm, a spokesperson for one of the plaintiffs' lawyers, said that issue would be determined later.

Ruypa Marya of the music group Ruypa & The April Fishes, who also fought the case, praised the court’s decision.

“I hope we can start reimagining copyright law to do what it's supposed to do — protect the creations of people who make stuff so that we can continue to make more stuff,” said Marya, who added she paid Warner/Chappell $455 (£300) to include “Happy Birthday To You” on a live album during which members of her band and audience sang the song to her the night before her birthday.

Warner/Chappell has said it does not attempt to collect royalties from members of the public singing the song and only targets those who use it in a commercial enterprise.

“We are looking at the court's lengthy opinion and considering our options,” Warner/Chappell said in a statement following Tuesday's ruling.

In his ruling King went into great detail about the history of “Happy Birthday To You,” which he said was derived from another popular children's song, “Good Morning to All.”

That song was written by sisters Mildred Hill and Patty Hill sometime before 1893, the judge said, adding that the sisters assigned the rights to it and other songs to Clayton F. Summy, who copyrighted and published them in a book titled “Song Stories for the Kindergarten.”

“The origins of the lyrics to Happy Birthday (the 'Happy Birthday lyrics') are less clear,” the judge continued, adding the first known reference to them appeared in a 1901 article in the Inland Educator and Indiana School Journal.

The full lyrics themselves, King said, didn't appear in print until 1911.

Since then, they have become the most famous lyrics in the English language, according to Guinness World Records. The song is also sung in countless other languages around the world.

Additional reporting by AP

Comments

Share your thoughts and debate the big issues

Learn more

Delete Comment

Are you sure you want to delete this comment?

Report Comment

Are you sure you want to mark this comment as inappropriate?

Please be respectful when making a comment and adhere to our Community Guidelines.

  • You may not agree with our views, or other users’, but please respond to them respectfully
  • Swearing, personal abuse, racism, sexism, homophobia and other discriminatory or inciteful language is not acceptable
  • Do not impersonate other users or reveal private information about third parties
  • We reserve the right to delete inappropriate posts and ban offending users without notification

You can find our Community Guidelines in full here.

Create a commenting name to join the debate

Create a commenting name to join the debate

  • Newest first
  • Oldest first
  • Most liked

There are no Independent Premium comments yet - be the first to add your thoughts

Please be respectful when making a comment and adhere to our Community Guidelines.

  • You may not agree with our views, or other users’, but please respond to them respectfully
  • Swearing, personal abuse, racism, sexism, homophobia and other discriminatory or inciteful language is not acceptable
  • Do not impersonate other users or reveal private information about third parties
  • We reserve the right to delete inappropriate posts and ban offending users without notification

You can find our Community Guidelines in full here.

Create a commenting name to join the debate

Create a commenting name to join the debate

  • Newest first
  • Oldest first
  • Most liked

There are no comments yet - be the first to add your thoughts