Short wants UN refugee body inquiry

Paul Waugh
Friday 06 August 1999 00:02
Comments

CLARE SHORT, the Secretary of State for International Development, called yesterday for a full inquiry into the performance of the United Nations High Commission for Refugees during the Kosovo conflict.

In a long-awaited response to MPs, Ms Short said the UNHCR should explain why it failed to react adequately to the exodus of ethnic Albanians fleeing the province.

Her call for an "independent, external valuation" of the agency's performance follows criticism from the Commons International Development Committee that it had badly mishandled the crisis.

Ms Short rejected claims that the Nato alliance should have built refugee camps in advance of the bombing, but agreed that UNHCR should have reacted much more quickly and efficiently.

In its own response to the MPs' criticism, the UNCHR admitted that it "should certainly have been better prepared".

Ms Short revealed that the Department for International Development had received no information about the UN's contingency planning process and was not invited to take part in the project.

The department had paid pounds 1.5m to the UNHCR for its Kosovo activity, but would in future link all funding to improvements in the agency's effectiveness.

Among the areas identified by the UK Government for improvement were contingency preparedness, field performance, financial accountability and openness.

The department's response to the MPs' report also makes clear that the huge problems with registration of refugees in the border camps in Macedonia and Albania were the fault of the UNHCR, and Ms Short complained about the issue at the time.

She denied that Britain had been unwilling to take large numbers of refugees and said the Government had made clear that it was up to the UN to find "suitable candidates" to be flown to Britain.

In her own submission, Sadako Ogata, the UN High Commissioner for Refugees, said she accepted that her organisation had not been sufficiently prepared, but would strive to do better in future.

Ms Ogata stressed, however, that the MPs' criticisms were largely unfair and failed to recognise that the Kosovo crisis had been a difficult and complex situation.

The select committee had described as a "disgraceful case of neglect", the UN's failure to check and keep the identity of all the refugees as soon as the came over the border. Ms Ogata said that such a system would have not been in the best interests of the refugees "whose immediate need for security, shelter and assistance was more important".

"Despite the problems and shortcomings, the rapidly mobilised response to the influxes did meet immediate life-sustaining needs, with minimal avoidable deaths among many hundreds of thousands of refugees," Ms Ogata said.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in