Stress tests are worth doing – but they need to be properly designed

Outlook

Jim Armitage
Tuesday 28 October 2014 01:39
Comments

Outlook Lloyds is in a tight spot. After coming in last of the UK banks under the weekend’s European stress tests, it received the inevitable bashing by the stock market yesterday. This was accompanied – and worsened by – a flurry of analysts declaring Lloyds was now clearly so weak that it wouldn’t be able to pay a dividend for years. To base such claims on the European stress tests seems unfair. For a start, don’t forget that Lloyds actually passed the tests, although without as many flying colours as its rivals.

Besides, the comparison with its rivals is an apples-with-pears job. The test focused on what would happen if there were a dramatic slump in house prices. Given that Halifax makes a quarter of all UK mortgages, of course its finances looks worse than other UK banks by that metric.

Not that they shouldn’t stress-test for the housing market. An increase in interest rates could trigger a pretty rapid house price decline across the country.

But banking risk isn’t just about home loans. As Lloyds’ disastrous Bank of Scotland arm taught us with its stupid lending in the Noughties, commercial property – shops and offices – can be just as dangerous.

Lending to the eurozone and eastern Europe is none too risk-free either. Fancy lending to Russian corporates since the Ukraine crisis, anyone? RBS and Barclays do, with regular abandon. And, while we’re at it, how about emerging markets in Asia, where HSBC and Standard Chartered so boldly go?

Had the stress tests based more assessment on cataclysms in those banking markets, Lloyds would have not looked quite as weak compared with its more internationally focused UK rivals.

That’s not to say the stress tests were a waste of time. Far from it. There’s nothing like a fire practice to get the adrenaline pumping and focus minds. It’s just that this drill only tested for a fire in the kitchen, when it’s more likely to be blazing away in the boiler room and the cigar lounge of the directors’ suite.

There’s another reason the European tests shouldn’t affect the Lloyds dividend. It’s not the European Banking Authority which decides whether the bank can make payouts to shareholders. That assessment is made by the Prudential Regulation Authority – which is conducting bank stress tests of its own, which are tougher than those of the Europeans.

The results will be out just before Christmas: only then will Lloyds’ chief Antonio Horta-Osorio find out if he’ll be playing Santa for shareholders.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in