View from City Road: Aerospace spared fresh horrors

Thursday 25 February 1993 00:02
Comments

THE LENTEN fast that British Aerospace has embarked upon will take a great deal longer than 40 days to produce results. But under the 'cost-down' religion espoused by John Cahill, chairman and ex-BTR man, a credible future that includes rising dividends is beginning to take shape.

The effects of a cost-reduction programme, expected to yield savings of pounds 200m a year at an annual rate, will not become apparent until the final quarter of this year. But armed with this and shorn of the running sore of regional aircraft losses, BAe could turn round from pre-exceptional losses of pounds 201m in 1992 to pre-tax profits of pounds 100m this year and double that in 1994.

In truth, both BAe and its share price have already anticipated something similar to this. Despite huge pre-tax losses and a pounds 220m overall net cash outflow, BAe has scrambled together enough distributable reserves to pay the interim dividend of 3p and a better-than-expected final of 4p.

Losses in 1992 would have been even higher if changes to the ways it accounts for pensions had not conveniently offset a pounds 36m DAF write-down and write-off of pounds 11m launch costs. The share price, which languished at 123p in late November, rose 13p to 265p partly out of relief that no new horrors were revealed and partly in response to the dividend. This leaves the shares on an historical yield of 3.5 per cent and a prospective multiple that is anywhere between 9 and 29, as analysts' forecasts for 1993 currently range between pounds 60m and pounds 150m - a measure of the market's uncertainty about BAe.

In the short term, profits from the bedrock defence division, which slipped from pounds 371m to pounds 352m, look set to fall. This assumes that new orders like the 48 Tornados lower profitability initially as mature contracts wind down.

Yesterday's figures were a reminder of how important it was to stanch the wounds of regional aircraft, since it appears to have lost more than pounds 400m in 1992. Other commercial aircraft, including a surplus from Airbus work, could cut losses from pounds 100m to pounds 60m, and Rover's pounds 49m deficit will shrink.

Until Arlington's property can be sold, cash flow remains a worry - end-year debt of pounds 257m and apparent gearing of 14 per cent sit oddly with net interest payments of pounds 126m in 1992 - in view of further sizeable outflows this year.

BAe shares require a risk premium. They are now discounting nearly doubled dividends, which must restrain the upside in an essentially trading stock.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in