Summer reading schools failed to raise standards

The Government's summer literacy schools failed to improve children's reading, but did make them more enthusiastic about learning. A report to be published today is expected to question the use of "quick-fix" solutions for poor readers, says Judith Judd, Education Editor.

Overall, the reading of 900 11-year-olds who attended the literacy summer schools scheme did not improve. Some actually chalked up lower scores on tests at the end of the course than they did at the beginning. Equally, some did better.

All the pupils, who were among those just below the expected standard for their age in reading, received 50 hours extra tuition in 29 two-week summer schools at a cost of pounds 300,000.

The scheme, which has the personal backing of the Prime Minister and was much trumpeted by the Government, was first publicised in June when Stephen Byers, the schools standards minister, said that 870 children would "be offered the chance to boost their reading skills at the new literacy summer schools".

At the end of August, the Prime Minster chose to mark his return from holiday by announcing that the scheme was being expanded to include 16,000 pupils at 500 centres next year.

Today's report, commissioned by advisers at the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority, is based on tests carried out by the National Foundation for Educational Research. The foundation tested a sample of children who attended this year's summer schools before and after their courses.

Its report is understood to suggest that other Government proposals such as a daily literacy hour in primary schools have a better prospect of raising standards than the summer schools. Ministers will, however, be able to argue that the schools have been a success because they have motivated pupils. The report says that they are more positive about both school and reading than they were last term. That may prove important in improving their reading in the long-term.

Better literacy is one of the Government's key pledges on education. Ministers have set a target for 80 per cent of 11-year-olds to have reached the expected standard in English by the year 2002. The present figure is 62 per cent.

Anne Barnes, general secretary of the National Association for the Teaching of English, said: "You cannot necessarily expect progress to show up immediately in tests. If there is an improvement in attitude that may lead to improvement over a whole year."

The Government, she suggested, is confused. There might be an argument for providing a reading activity during the holidays but that would not necessarily lead to improved reading. Children progress best with teachers who knew them well, she added.

In August, Mr Blair promised another pounds 4 million of Government money for summer literacy schools and Downing Street said that Maurice Hatter, chairman of IMO Precisions Controls, would donate a further pounds 1 million. Mr Hatter's donation was disclosed hours after Mr Blair appealed for private sector investment to match the Government's.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in