Abolition of school building rules given firm backing

THE ABOLITION of school building regulations, setting minimum repair and maintenance targets, is being considered by ministers.

The Department for Education said yesterday that a review of the regulations, set up in October 1990, was complete.

It had originally been suggested that the review of the 1981 Education (School Premises) Regulations was designed to update the regulations, under which a pounds 2bn backlog of work has been identified.

But the National Audit Office revealed in 1991 that ministers were planning to consider 'any recommendations arising from the review for bringing the regulations up to date or abolishing them'. The abolition option was strongly supported by two former education ministers yesterday. Sir Rhodes Boyson, an education minister from 1979 to 1983, said: 'I have always seen these regulations as a bureaucratic monstrosity.

'I'd do away with them and put the schools under basic local authority standards. That decision would be in line with the instincts of the Prime Minister to cut back on useless regulation.'

Bob Dunn, a minister in the department from 1983 to 1988, said: 'The regulations made some sense in 1981 when the schools came under local education authorities. But now we have a patchwork of different schools - grant-maintained, city technology colleges, specialist schools - it is very hard to square the circle and I'd be inclined to dump them.'

Eric Forth, who represents the same right-wing tradition as Sir Rhodes and Mr Dunn, is the minister with responsibility for school building and could be expected to share their view.

Ministers believe that the case for abolition has been strengthened by the opting out of schools from local authority control. The Comptroller and Auditor Gneral said in 1991 that he had been told by the department that opted-out schools carried out routine repair work 'more speedily, more extensively and at a lower cost than previously'. Baroness Blatch, the minister responsible for the opted-out (grant-maintained) sector, announced yesterday the distribution of pounds 77m worth of building grants - including pounds 17.8m based on a formula of pounds 11,000 per school and pounds 20 per pupil.

A spokesman said that formula was much more generous than the deal offered to state schools, but he did not know what state schools were getting because that was up to local education authorities to decide.

The Government has already allocated pounds 500m for the grant- maintained schools' capital programme over the next three years. There are currently 337 schools operating on a grant-maintained basis, with a further 48 approved.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in