Moore and Peters flay weak Surrey attack

<preform>Worcestershire 400-4 v Surrey 155 & 111-4</preform>

Jon Culley
Saturday 26 June 2004 00:00
Comments

Surrey's resemblance to the vibrant team that has won the Championship three times in the past five years is looking less convincing by the day. Uncomfortably placed in a pack of seven counties lodged between clear leaders Warwickshire and disconnected Northamptonshire, they will do well to avoid a demoralising defeat here.

Surrey's resemblance to the vibrant team that has won the Championship three times in the last five years is looking pale. Uncomfortably placed in a pack of seven sides lodged between clear leaders Warwickshire and disconnected Northamptonshire, they will be lucky to avoid a demoralising defeat here.

The pitch, too lively, apparently, for Surrey to manage more than 155 on Thursday, is much easier than that, as the home side demonstrated yesterday. Fifteen in front with all their wickets intact when the morning session began, they scored at four runs an over to claim full batting points before declaring 45 minutes before tea. Stephen Peters and Stephen Moore, Worcestershire's new opening combination, had reached 240 before a listless attack finally prised them apart.

It had been their most productive partnership so far, by some distance. But both have been in fine form. Peters completed his third hundred in consecutive innings at New Road, Moore his second in a row and a career-best of 146. Had Moore, a bright prospect at 23, not stretched for a widish ball in the last over of the morning, providing wicketkeeper Jon Batty with his second catch off Adam Hollioake, he might have added handsomely to his 22 boundaries.

Amid all this, Graeme Hick missed out, caught behind without scoring. The maestro still needs one more century to match WG Grace's 126. But no matter: Ben Smith and Andrew Hall fluently added another 129, for a lead of 245.

For a time Surrey appeared to have some defiance in them, even with Graham Thorpe's appearance delayed because he had been unwell. But Mark Butcher was out just after tea, before Hall saw off Mark Ramprakash and Hollioake in the space of three balls and then dismissed Scott Newman. Batty fell to his namesake Gareth before Ally Brown departed, playing across the line to Matt Mason.

The day's allotted overs were completed with Surrey six down and still 78 short of an innings defeat, but Worcestershire's request for the extra half-hour was declined. Rain is forecast for today but it will need a lot to save Surrey.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in