Boris Johnson's proposal to relocate House of Lords to York rejected

Review of parliament renovations will not consider the idea

Boris Johnson faces opposition in the House of Lords
Boris Johnson faces opposition in the House of Lords

Boris Johnson's proposal to temporarily move the House of Lords to York has been rejected by the body in charge of renovating the upper house.

The prime minister was reportedly keen on the idea as a symbolic way to stress his commitment to rebalancing the country away from the capital, short of real devolution of power.

But the Restoration and Renewal Sponsor Body and Delivery Authority, which is carrying out a review of plans to revamp the Palace of Westminster, said it would not consider such an idea.

The authority is reviewing plans, which were first costed at £4 billion in 2014 and which have yet to get off the ground.

In a letter to the prime minister, the body said there were "constitutional implications" of moving peers and MPs outside of London and that it was thus not within its scope to decide.

The letter added that whether parliament should be moved was "a matter for both Houses to determine rather than for our review".

"This option will not, therefore, be considered as part of the scope of the strategic review," it added.

"In line with best practice, we remain committed to developing a business case that will set out in detail the options for restoring Parliament including cost estimates and timescales."

The plan to relocate to York was criticised by the Lord Speaker Lord Fowler, who complained that it amounted to "gesture politics". York City Council's leadership however welcomed the proposal.

In 2018 MPs and peers agreed that when renovation goes ahead, they will "decant" to temporary facilities outside the place for the duration of the renovations.

The authority delivering the works says they are needed because the Victorian mock-gothic palace is "falling apart faster than they can be fixed".

The most often mentioned alternative location for the Commons during the renovations is Richmond House, a building around the corner from the palace that currently houses the Department of Health.

An option in London would avoid any need to temporarily relocate the entire industry of public affairs and political journalism to another city for a limited period of time.

Proponents of moving the legislature's base out of London however say the renovations are a good opportunity to do so either on a trial basis or permanently.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in