Customs 'urged to avoid Matrix Churchill trial'

CUSTOMS were urged by another government department not to bring charges against businessmen in the Matrix Churchill case, the Scott inquiry was told yesterday.

Officials from the Department of Trade and Industry were anxious to avoid ministers being forced to give evidence, thus parading the Government's 'dirty washing' in open court.

Michael Coolican, a senior DTI official, had wanted to deal with the case by calling in the defendants and 'slapping them across the wrist', rather than prosecute them.

Peter Wiltshire, the senior Customs investigating officer, said the idea was rejected as it could have prejudiced future legal proceedings.

It was also revealed that Customs had little faith in Anthony Steadman, an important DTI witness who gave vital evidence in the Matrix Churchill trial. That evidence was being relied upon to rebut defence claims that the Government knew that machine-tool exports were destined for Iraqi munitions factories, in breach of official guidelines, but 'turned a blind eye' to them.

Customs documents revealed it was recommended that Mr Steadman's involvement in the prosecution case be 'minimised to the unavoidable' because he was perceived to be 'weak'.

Mr Wiltshire described the witness as 'honest but nervous'. He said criticisms of Mr Steadman were not passed to him but, irrespective of these, he was confident that Mr Steadman was a valid witness because of his 'firmness' in rebutting the defence arguments.

'I was confident he would come up to proof on this aspect,' Mr Wiltshire said. He denied that Mr Steadman was a witness who 'agreed too readily to things he shouldn't be agreeing to'.

When Mr Steadman gave evidence at the trial, he failed to remember a crucial meeting where Alan Clark, a former Defence and Trade minister, was accused of giving 'a nod and a wink' to manufacturers to breach export guidelines to Iraq by stressing the equipment's peaceful uses.

Mr Wiltshire also denied trying to suppress government papers useful to the defence. The minutes of a secret Whitehall committee at which Matrix Churchill was linked to a GCHQ report about a British firm supplying Iraqi munitions plants, were never released to the defence.

The committee included Defence, DTI and Foreign Office officials who were all involved in granting export licences to the firm.

The document was 'overlooked', he said, though he admitted it could have had a bearing on the trial. 'I think there was a situation where the jury could have said 'it serves HMG (the Government) right'.' He insisted that it had not deliberately been withheld. 'There was no question of suppressing things.'

The inquiry continues.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in