Charity urges legal duty to see at-risk children

Social workers should be under a legal duty to see any children who might be at risk on their own during the course of a protection inquiry, the National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children said today.

The NSPCC is calling for a change in the law in England to prevent a repeat of cases like that of Birmingham seven-year-old Khyra Ishaq, who died of starvation and neglect in 2008 after social workers failed to see her.

The charity's head of policy Diana Sutton said a change in the law would give social workers more power to get past manipulative parents who intimidate or conceal their children to try to hide the evidence of their mistreatment.

Ms Sutton told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: "Too often we see cunning and manipulative parents actually trying to hide abuse from social workers.

"In case after case, we see that children haven't been spoken to on their own, so they haven't had an opportunity to actually say what is really going on.

"We don't want this to be a heavy-handed tool. We want it to be a legal change that will drive a change in practice so that it becomes routine that they have to - as part of the child protection inquiry - talk to the child on their own and establish directly with the child what is going on."

If they are not able to conduct a private interview with the child, social workers should be required by law to record the reasons why," said Ms Sutton.

The chief executive of the British Association of Social Workers, Hilton Dawson, said that social workers already had the power under the Children Act to seek a court order requiring parents to allow them to see children on their own.

Mr Dawson told Today: "If parents blatantly refuse and manipulate or threaten to set the dog on social workers, then they have exactly the same recourse as what the NSPCC are proposing."

And he added: "We welcome the NSPCC raising this, but we think that there are bigger issues around the number of social workers, the workload of social workers, training and support of social workers and the career structure that we need to keep the most experienced social workers in frontline practice."

But Ms Sutton said that a court order was a "heavy-handed tool" which tended to be used later in the process of a child protection inquiry, while the NSPCC's proposal could make a private conversation with the child a routine and early part of every probe.

She said: "At the moment, there is a duty to listen to the child's wishes and feelings, but that is obviously not the same as seeing the child on their own."

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in