Complaints over foul language on TV up 60%

Maggie Brown
Thursday 21 July 1994 23:02
Comments

BROADCASTERS were criticised yesterday for allowing too much bad language in programmes, and of appearing to take no notice of the rising numbers of complaints from offended viewers.

The Broadcasting Standards Council's annual report, published yesterday, shows that complaints about bad language rose by 60 per cent to 235, during the year ending 31 March, causing concern for the third year running.

Elspeth Howe, who chairs the Government-appointed watchdog, said at a press conference in London: 'The broadcasters have not taken notice. I like to think what's happening is a bit of a fashion, not a deliberate policy, Maybe they (the broadcasters) haven't seen it as an issue.'

Lady Howe said that in many cases using bad language was unnecessary and debased the English language. An appropriate use was when swear words were used as a dramatic device, a means of indicating potential violence.

The council is also worried about the upsurge in complaints about screen violence, especially about scenes depicting violence and sex. It points to the danger of giving 'crime an undue prominence in the schedules, upsetting the overall balance of material', and is also continuing to point out the dangers of dramatised crime reconstructions. During the year it censured both the BBC and ITV for their coverage of the James Bulger case.

The council, which has a remit to handle complaints about sex, violence, taste and decency, reported a sharp increase in complaints to 2,390 (compared with 2,023), of which 1,711 were within its remit - up 26 per cent on the previous year. Some 49 per cent were from women, 48 per cent from men and 3 per cent from couples.

The largest single category of complaints were about bad taste. The council says this increase does not neccessarily reflect falling standards - though the public is clearly concerned about violence - but is an indication of the willingness to complain. Complaints have risen about programmes screened before the 9pm watershed.

The rise also demonstrates that the BSC, operating in its sixth year, is becoming better known. The upward trend has also reported by the Broadcasting Complaints Commission, which handles complaints about inaccuracy, unfairness and privacy, and the Independent Television Commission.

The council also points to a significant rise in complaints about lapses of taste in radio programmes, and the increased use of sex in television and radio commercials. It is currently carrying out research into radio, and is considering whether it should also be covered by some form of watershed, to protect children.

Broadcasting Standards Council, Annual Report 1994; 7 The Sanctuary, London SW1P 3JS; pounds 4.

(Graphic omitted)

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in