UN may give millions to Burma junta

Steve Crawshaw
Friday 27 November 1998 00:02
Comments

SUPPORTERS OF the Burmese opposition reacted warily yesterday to news that the United Nations is considering offering the ruling military regime up to $1bn (pounds 602m) in financial and humanitarian aid, in return for progress towards democracy.

The United Nations envoy, Alvaro de Soto, was in Rangoon last month to discuss the deal. Officials close to the project said that the reported $1bn figure of proposed aid and investment was untrue. But the United Nations and World Bank have been actively involved in trying to provide a suitable carrot-and-stick package that might unlock the stalemate between the opposition and the regime.

The Foreign Office minister Derek Fatchett is understood to have sought further assurances from Mr de Soto in recent days that money would not be disbursed without guarantees.

Certainly, the main worry of supporters of the Burmese opposition is that the regime could, in effect, take the money and run. Officials emphasise that the Burmese government is a long way from saying yes. Much though they would like the money, the military regime is not keen on negotiating with Aung San Suu Kyi's party, the New League for Democracy, which won more than 80 per cent of the seats in elections in 1990.

Equally, if they do decide to accept the offer, that could itself be problematic. John Jackson, a director of the Burma Action Group, said: "If they accept, I would be extremely sceptical." He argued that mere negotiations with the opposition should not be enough to loosen international purse strings. "They could negotiate for years and it wouldn't achieve anything."

The stalemate between the regime and the opposition has focused minds on both sides.The NLD has made little progress in pressing for change. Meanwhile, the combination of the Asian crisis and the generals' dismal management of the economy means that some at least in the regime are worried that they, too, are in a political cul-de-sac. Splits in the regime have been widely rumoured.

Publicly, Britain has taken a lead in pressing for tougher action against Burma. It also hosted a meeting, attended by officials from a clutch of Western and Asian countries, at which the de Soto initiative was discussed.

Britain's own position is ambiguous. It was revealed last week that the new Burmese foreign minister was being allowed into Britain, in contravention of an EU visa ban. U Win Aung, the ambassador to London since 1995, is "foreign minister designate" and he is about to leave for Burma permanently.

Nepal and Bhutan are to resume talks involving the repatriation of nearly 100,000 Bhutanese refugees living inNepal for the past eight years.

Relations between the two Himalayan kingdoms have been strained since Nepalese-speaking Bhutanese started fleeing to Nepal in the early Eighties after Bhutan tightened citizenship regulations.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in