Consumer watchdogs scolded

Sonia Purnell
Sunday 05 December 1999 00:02
Comments

A HIGH-LEVEL government report will slam Britain's consumer protection watchdogs this week and call for a clamp down on rogue traders and sharp practices on the high street.

In the first wholesale review of the consumer protection system for 30 years, the National Audit Office and Audit Commission will jointly state that "rip off" Britain has been allowed to prosper under the current toothless regime.

There are also fears that too many unsafe products such as children's toys and food are still widely available; that unscrupulous estate agents are able to operate with impunity; and that it is too easy to give consumers short measures.

The report, to be published on Wednesday and called "Protecting the Consumer from Unfair Trading Practices", is expected to question whether the Office of Fair Trading and the 1,800 trading standards officers working across the country are providing value for money.

One problem likely to be highlighted is the lack of co-operation between jurisdictions - as officers report exclusively to their local authorities - and between local officers and the OFT at the national level. It is also thought likely to question why some local authorities spend so much more than others without necessarily providing better consumer protection.

Recently published figures showed that expenditure ranged from pounds 3.85 per head of population in Shropshire down to pounds 1.74 in Hertfordshire.

Despite the Government's promises to fight "rip-off Britain", several counties have cut their spending on consumer protection in recent years.

However, Wednesday's report is expected to warn against any further financial pressures on recruitment or training which could only further weaken consumer protection.

The OFT, set up in 1973, is responsible for identifying and tackling unfair trading practices nationally. But the report is expected to highlight the fact that - despite its recently completed high-profile investigations into price rigging by supermarkets and car manufacturers, now before the Competition Commissioner - the OFT is often hindered from taking forthright action against persistent wrongdoers even when the case against them is proved.

Under existing laws, the Director-General of Fair Trading, John Bridgeman, has to go through a lengthy process of seeking assurances from traders about their future conduct before he can take legal action.

Frequently, traders take advantage of this weakness in the law to spin out the process almost indefinitely - a fact that Mr Bridgeman has repeatedly pointed out in a bid for a change in the law.

The report, an unusual joint production by the two highly influential watchdogs, is also expected to call on both the OFT and trading standards officers to be more responsive to public concerns.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in