Our man in Havana

At pounds 695 for a box of 25, Montecristo A cigars cost more than the flight to Cuba itself; n IS IT WORTH IT? n

Anna Melville James
Sunday 20 December 1998 00:02
Comments

I smoke, therefore I am. Were Descartes a puffer, he might well have written this footnote to describe the Montecristo A cigar. As tobacco goes, there's not much more of a smoking statement than this 91/4 inch Havanan cohiba. Begone you apologetic low tar cigarettes. This is smokin' large, smokin' proud and at pounds 695 for a box of 25, smokin' rich, for people who haven't read the PC handbook.

Nestling in a cedarwood box, these cigars are tobacco artworks. "Montecristo A's are more expensive because they last so long, require a very big wrapper leaf to hold the tobacco and are handmade with painstaking attention to detail," says Paul Prichett, manager of premier cigar sellers, Davidoffs of London.

Indeed the intricacy of making a Montecristo A is such that dividing price between number of hours spent in preparation makes a box of 25 a positive bargain. From air-curing the tobacco, through two fermentations, grading, blending and the intricacies of hand rolling, this is no "pile 'em high, sell 'em cheap" experience. By the time the Montecristo A has made its way out of Cuba, it has been lovingly guided through a couple of years and 23 separate stages of existence in order to fulfil its smoking destiny.

Machine-made panatellas such as 10 Hamlet at pounds 2.54 are just ill-bred upstarts in comparison. Whizzed through production, untouched by the sensitive hand of a Torcedore (cigar roller), and available in every newsagent, they lack the taste and class of a pleasure worth waiting and paying for.

Immediately cheaper, lesser smokes have a sneaky and expensive disposable quality, debunking the budget argument. Each four-hour, 47-ring gauge Montecristo A is an epic event in itself, and as such, the most you will toke is one per evening, a cost effective manoeuvre for the discerning palate.

So strike a light and savour these ostentatious smokes like fine wines. Parallels between the cigar and wine industries mean that smoking an alternative is the equivalent of choosing lager top over Chteau Petrus.

Of course, as world leaders have shown, you don't actually need to smoke a cigar to enjoy it's full potential. Impeachment looks likely to follow now that Bill and Monica have enjoyed their Havana moment, but let's look on the bright side. Bill, like all afficianados, knows the value of a good cigar. If you're going to play Russian roulette with your health, bank balance or political office, at least do it in style.

Anna Melville-James

Enquiries: Hunter & Frankan, London SW6 tel 0171 471 8400

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in