AQA exam board forced to apologise to Thomas Cook for out of date AS-level question

The travel firm complained to AQA after the board featured a case study question using redundancy figures from three years ago

Thomas Cook requested an apology from AQA for painting the company in a bad light
Thomas Cook requested an apology from AQA for painting the company in a bad light

A major school exam board has been made to apologise to Thomas Cook travel firm over a question about the company in one of this year’s AS-level papers.

The AQA Business Studies paper, taken by thousands of students across the country last week, included a case study detailing plans for store closures and redundancies at the company.

According to the company, the case study question featured information that was three years old – a point that AQA failed to make clear to students.

A spokesperson from Thomas Cook admitted that a formal complaint was made following a “backlash on social media” painting the company in a poor light.

The exam board has not released details of the question itself because it says it avoids publishing recent papers which may be used as mock exams for future test preparation.

In a statement, AQA said: “Our AS-level business studies paper featured a case study about travel company Thomas Cook's plans for store closures and redundancies.”

“Thomas Cook has asked us to point out that the information used in this case study was from 2013 and doesn't reflect their current circumstances or plans.”

“We're happy to do so and apologise for any misunderstanding.”

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in