Deadly ship strikes on endangered whale sharks could be causing fall in numbers, research finds

Other marine “megafauna” such as dolphins, whales, porpoises and sea turtles are also at risk of being hit

Saphora Smith
Climate Correspondent
Monday 09 May 2022 20:26
Comments
<p>Whale sharks are an endangered species and the world’s largest fish</p>

Whale sharks are an endangered species and the world’s largest fish

Leer en Español

Deadly ship strikes on whale sharks could be responsible for a fall in the population of the endangered species, a new study has found.

The authors of the report published on Monday in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences journal found the movements of whale sharks often overlap with those of large ships in both location and time, which could explain why numbers of the world’s largest fish are falling.

It is not only whale sharks that are at risk, with other marine “megafauna” such as dolphins, whales, porpoises and sea turtles also likely affected by ship strikes, according to the study.

Whale sharks are known to travel large distances to find enough food to sustain their large size - they weigh around 11 tons and are around 40 feet long, according to the WWF.

The authors said data on fatal collisions between ships and endangered species was lacking so, in an attempt to rectify that, the team analysed the movements of 348 sharks and ships bigger than 300 tons.

They found that sharks routinely crossed busy shipping routes, spent almost half of their time in surface waters at similar depths as vessels and used space that overlapped with ships.

The collision risk estimates corresponded with regional reports of shark deaths from ship strikes, and the last locations of likely dead sharks carrying tracking tags that ceased transmitting coincided with busy routes.

Taken together, the findings indicate that undetected or unrecorded ship strikes may be responsible for a substantial proportion of whale shark deaths, potentially explaining population decline despite protection from international trade and low fishing-induced mortality.

The report found collision risk hotspots spanned all major oceans but were concentrated in gulf regions.

The authors said the findings highlighted the need for collision monitoring, vessel speed regulation, and localised conservation measures to reduce the threat of lethal ship strikes to surface-dwelling marine life.

In the meantime, global vessel traffic is increasing alongside world economic growth, with more than 80 per cent of goods by volume now transported by sea, the report noted.

The report was authored by Freya Womersley, who is based at the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom in Plymouth, and colleagues from around the world including Portugal, New Zealand and Saudi Arabia.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in