Kabul airport explosion: What is the significance of the target sites near Baron hotel?

The US and allied countries had warned that such attacks were likely to happen

<p>Smoke rises from explosion outside the airport in Kabul</p>

Smoke rises from explosion outside the airport in Kabul

Leer en Español

At least 13 people are feared to have been killed and at least 15 injured by suicide bombers in Afghanistan, according to reports.

The two attacks took place just outside of Kabul’s Hamid Karzai International Airport and at the nearby Baron hotel.

Before the attacks happened, the US and allied countries had urged people to avoid the area around the airport due to the “acute” threat of attacks by affiliates of the so-called Islamic State (Isis) or al-Qaeda.

Follow Afghanistan news LIVE: Latest updates as suspected suicide bombing outside Kabul airport

It comes amid thousands of people desperately trying to leave the country before the 31 August deadline, to flee the Taliban’s rise to power.

What is the significance of the area that were targeted in the attacks?

One suicide bombing happened close to the Abbey Gate entrance to the airport’s airfield and another is reported to have occurred near the Baron hotel – less than one mile away from the airport.

The hotel was being used as a centre for processing Afghan people that are hoping to be evacuated from the country to flee the Taliban, and was mainly used by British officials.

The 160-room hotel is also near to Camp Sullivan, which is a self-contained facility for the local guard force that provides protection to all official US facilities in the capital city.

The hotel’s website says the accommodation is “one of the most prestigious secured lodging projects in Kabul” as its security is provided by a private company from the US, is surrounded by a four-metre-high perimeter wall, and has five guard towers.

It add that it is next to International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) meaning it benefits from being “within the buffer zone of security for both of these landmarks.”

Abbey Gate, where the second blast happened, is an entrance to the airport that is controlled by the British but is only accessible via Taliban checkpoints.

Loading....

Before the blasts, UK armed forces minister James Heappey had said that Afghans aiming to be evacuated to the UK should avoid the airport as there had been “very, very credible reporting of an imminent attack”.

He added that the “worsening security situation” in Kabul means British forces will “probably get out fewer people” than had been hoped before Tuesday’s evacuation deadline.

Mr Heappey said the threat is specifically from an Isis affiliate known as Isis-K, a branch of the terror group in the Khorasan Province.

The US state department had urged those at Abbey Gate, east gate or north gate “should leave immediately.”

It had cited unspecified “security threats” and advised people to approach only if “you receive individual instructions from a US government representative to do so”.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in