Sacramento Police announce new body cam rules after Stephon Clark shooting

Officers must now state the reason for turning off their body cam before doing so

Clark Mindock
New York
Wednesday 11 April 2018 18:28
Comments
Mr Clark was a 22-year-old father of two
Mr Clark was a 22-year-old father of two

The Sacramento Police Department has announced new body cam policies for its officers after two policemen muted their microphones following the fatal shooting of Stephon Clark.

The department sent out a written directive to inform officers when they are allowed to turn off their body cameras last week, noting that the policy had been in the works since last year, but that the shooting of Mr Clark last month had made it necessary for swift action.

A copy of the written directive provided to The Independent says that officers can turn off their body cameras when discussing medical issues or when dealing with a sensitive victim, when body cam batteries are low if the officer is not an active part of an investigation, or under extraordinary circumstances. They must also verbalize the reason for shutting off their body cams before doing so.

Mr Clark’s case gained national notoriety last month after the police department made the unusual decision to release the body camera footage just three days after Mr Clark was killed. The video shows police responding to reports that someone in the neighbourhood was breaking car windows, and then Mr Clark — a 22-year-old father of two — being shot eight times, primarily in his back.

After the shooting, it was discovered that Mr Clark was not armed at the time of his death. He had been standing in his grandmother’s backyard with his cell phone.

Officers were later told to turn off their body cameras, though it is unclear who gave that order.

Mr Clark’s death has sparked another wave of national protests against police brutality and police killings of unarmed black men in the US.

The decision by the Sacramento Police Department to implement stricter rules for body cameras in the wake of the shooting was met with some degree of relief from the community in Sacramento, but experts on police use of force say that the policy should have been in place long before this most recent killing.

“At least at this point they’ve got the power rules in there now,” Geoffrey Alpert, a professor of criminology at the University of South Carolina, told the Associated Press. “It shouldn’t happen again, but it shouldn’t have happened in the first place.”

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in