US threat deepens Labour unease

Andy McSmith
Sunday 30 March 2003 02:00
Comments

Tony Blair's battle to convince the Labour Party he has done the right thing by involving Britain in the Iraq war was made harder yesterday by the threat of US action against Syria.

The prospect of another military strike against an Arab country, however remote the possibility, was enough to spur a former Foreign Office minister to call for an immediate ceasefire.

It is the first time that one of the leading campaigners to stop the war taking place has suggested, since hostilities started, that they should be called off before the coalition has achieved its aim of removing Saddam Hussein.

Doug Henderson, a former minister for Europe and a leading critic of the war, criticised the comments of the US Defence Secretary, Donald Rumsfeld, who had warned the Syrian government that it would be "held responsible" for cross-border trade in military supplies to Iraq.

Mr Henderson said the comments highlighted the danger that war in Iraq would spill into other countries in the region and called for the coalition to declare a ceasefire and withdraw troops from Iraq, using strengthened no-fly zones to contain Saddam in the future.

He told the BBC Radio 4 programme The World at One: "As Arab opinion is lost throughout the Middle East, there will be enormous pressure on young Arab persons to join the Iraqis in different ways, and one of the ways will be supplying arms.

"If the American government then said that was totally unacceptable and they would take military action to prevent it, there really would be a major escalation.

"That's always been my fear: that the attempt to remove Saddam would cause such instability in the Middle East and such ill-feeling between the Muslim world and non-Muslim world. Better ways have to be found to contain him.

"All I can see is a major escalation – with all the risks of involving Syria, Iran and Turkey – or a ceasefire and a withdrawal. And I think a ceasefire and withdrawal is, by far, the better way forward."

Meanwhile, some of the Prime Minister's most hardened opponents were meeting in London yesterday to plan how they could "reclaim" control of the party.

There was also increasing evidence of Labour MPs who have backed Mr Blair coming under threat within their own constituencies – particularly in areas with high concentrations of Muslims.

Mark Seddon, editor of Tribune, called for the creation of a new organisation, Labour Refoundation, to challenge Mr Blair over the political direction of the party.

He was speaking at a meeting in London of about 300 delegates to a Labour Against the War conference. The conference voted by more than two to one for a resolution to replace Mr Blair as leader of the Labour Party.

John McDonnell, a left-wing Labour MP, told them: "This is not about Blair. Forget about Blair. He's not the leader of our party. He does not represent me, he does not represent you, he does not represent Labour parties and trade unions. He's gone."

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in