- Sunday 06 January 2013
- My Account
- Logout
- Register
- Login
- News
-
Voices
- Editorials
- Comment
-
writers
- Yasmin Alibhai-Brown
- Rebecca Armstrong
- Guy Adams
- Memphis Barker
- Terence Blacker
- Chris Blackhurst
- Archie Bland
- Ian Burrell
- Andrew Buncombe
- Katherine Butler
- Ben Chu
- Patrick Cockburn
- Laura Davis
- Mary Dejevsky
- Grace Dent
- Robert Fisk
- Andrew Grice
- Viv Groskop
- Adrian Hamilton
- Philip Hensher
- Howard Jacobson
- Ellen E Jones
- Owen Jones
- Emily Jupp
- Simon Kelner
- Dominic Lawson
- Donald Macintyre
- IV Drip
- Our Voices
- Debate
- Letters
- Commentators
- Columnists
- Democracy 2015
- Campaigns
- Sport
- Tech
- Life
- Property
- Arts & Ents
- Travel
- Money
- IndyBest
- Blogs
- Student
Wednesday 2 January 2013
Editorial: Let taxpayers share rail fare pain
Another year, another inflation-busting hike for train fares. Season tickets went up by more than four per cent today and some "unregulated" fares (on non-commuter routes) soared by almost half. Nor is this a one-off hit to travellers' wallets. A decade of consecutive increases has left many commuters paying as much as 50 per cent more than in 2003. Cue much ire and another demonstration – this time at London's St Pancras station.
In fairness, there is no easy answer to the question of how to pay for the railways. The network is crying out for modernisation and expensive programmes such as electrification are long overdue. But although some increase in fares is unavoidable, there is a limit to what passengers can be expected to bear, particularly those relying on trains to get to work and with little choice as to where and when they travel.
There is, then, a reasonable case for taxpayers to meet some of the cost. After all, the rail network is a common good of benefit to all and decent – affordable – trains are central to encouraging drivers to make greener travel plans. But reform of our inefficient and fragmented rail industry, which costs around 40 per cent more to run than France's SNCF, must also be expedited. And more effort must be made to spread the investment costs more widely.
A shake-up of Britain's Byzantine fare structures would be a good place to start. Not only are passengers baffled by the incomprehensible array of tickets on offer, such a system is also hugely wasteful. An online bargain for one traveller simply bumps up the cost for their less organised, or simply less flexible, fellows. Equally, with money so tight, there must be a question mark over the availability of subsidised rail tickets to all over the age of 60, regardless of their financial circumstances.
To meet the railways' investment needs, the Government has pencilled in another five years of above-inflation fare rises. Yet England already has Europe's most expensive rail travel. More must be done to share the burden.
-
My Big Fat Quiz of the Year and a case of entirely confected outrage
Simon Kelner -
The case for an independent Falklands
Paul Vallely -
Big Fat Quiz going ‘too far’? It’s as old as the oldest joke
John Walsh -
Frankie Boyle vs. James Arthur: who won the Twitter row?
-
The top 10 comedians who were told they took it too far
Sian Boyle
Win flights to New Orleans
Experience everything on offer in one of America's prettiest and most hospitable cities.
Discover the majesty of El Hierro
So this is how Europe ends: with raw, magnificent beauty. By Simon Calder
Experience the Heineken Hub
Get free wi-fi and exclusive i content while you enjoy a tasty pint of Heineken at participating pubs.
Enter the latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Business videos from commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.