Kidnapping the boss, blocking the roads: The French way of protest

John Lichfield
Wednesday 19 July 2000 00:00
Comments

The threat by textile workers in Givet, on the FrancoBelgian border, to blow up their chemical-packed factory may seem unbelievable but, in a sense, it is a natural progression from the official tolerance of political and social violence in France.

The threat by textile workers in Givet, on the FrancoBelgian border, to blow up their chemical-packed factory may seem unbelievable but, in a sense, it is a natural progression from the official tolerance of political and social violence in France.

It has become almost common for workers with a grievance to kidnap their managing director, block a motorway or destroy competing foreign produce. The reaction of the French authorities is always languid. Prosecutions rarely follow.

The official view is that politics and social unrest in France is traditionally played out in the street. It is better to let such protests work themselves out than to inflame them by opposing them.

In 1994, French fishermen burned the historic Breton parliament in Rennes. There were no convictions.

In 1998, cereal farmers invaded and smashed up the office of the Green environment minister, Dominique Voynet. They were defended by centre-right politicians. There has been talk of prosecutions but no action so far.

When the small farmers' leader José Bové was on trial recently for destroying a half-built McDonald's restaurant last year, he was lionised in the French press and even praised by the Prime Minister, Lionel Jospin.

What Mr Bové did was a mild act of terrorism. What the Givet workers are threatening to do - to blow up their factory unless they receive higher redundancy payments and job guarantees - is a full-blown act of terrorism. Whether they go ahead with their threat or not, they are using the fear of widespread destruction of property and pollution of the environment to enforce their demands.

This is terrorism, although the French government prefers to call it blackmail. Either way, on past evidence, Paris is likely to solve the problem by caving in.

In a way, the Givet workers are behaving rationally. As one woman sitting in at the factory said yesterday, violence always gets a reaction from the official classes in Paris and usually a positive one. Having seen other groups of workers use violence successfully in the past - farmers, lorry drivers - the desperate textile workers of Givet seized the only weapon they had: the explosives and chemicals stored in their factory.

There is an escalation going on here. Standard industrial violence - kidnapping senior executives or blocking roads - has now become so commonplace as to be relatively ineffective. The Cellatex workers in Givet have pushed the logic of industrial or social violence one stage further.

What next? Disgruntled Dassault workers buzzing the Prime Minister's office in Mirage jets?

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in